arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2102.00637cs.LGq-bio.QM
收藏

使用生存数据的机器学习模型计算与解释变量相关的风险比

Computing the Hazard Ratios Associated with Explanatory Variables Using Machine Learning Models of Survival Data

Genentech(基因泰克);Stanford University(斯坦福大学)

Sameer Sundrani, James Lu

摘要:

目的:Cox比例风险(CoxPH)模型在生存数据中的应用和风险比(HR)的推导已经得到很好的建立。虽然已经开发了非线性的基于树的机器学习(ML)模型并将其应用于生存分析,但不存在用于计算与此类模型的解释变量相关的HR的方法。我们描述了一种使用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)值从基于树的ML模型计算HR的新方法,这是一种局部准确和一致的方法来量化解释变量对预测的贡献。研究方法:我们使用了三组公开的生存数据,包括结肠癌、乳腺癌或泛癌患者,并将CoxPH的性能与最先进的ML模型XGBoost进行了比较。为了计算XGBoost模型中解释变量的HR,对SHAP值取幂,并计算两个亚组的平均值比值。通过自举训练数据并生成ML模型1000次来计算置信区间。在这三个数据集中,我们系统地比较了所有解释变量的HR。在分析中使用了Python和R的开源库。结果如下:对于结肠癌和乳腺癌数据集,CoxPH和XGBoost的性能相当,并且我们在计算的HR中显示出良好的一致性。在泛癌症数据集中,我们在大多数变量中显示出一致性,但在CoxPH和XGBoost结果之间的两个解释变量中也有相反的发现。随后的Kaplan-Meier图支持XGBoost模型的发现。结论:从ML模型中导出HR有助于从复杂的生存数据集中识别风险因素,并增强对临床试验结果的预测。

英文摘要:

Purpose: The application of Cox Proportional Hazards (CoxPH) models to survival data and the derivation of Hazard Ratio (HR) is well established. While nonlinear, tree-based Machine Learning (ML) models have been developed and applied to the survival analysis, no methodology exists for computing HRs associated with explanatory variables from such models. We describe a novel way to compute HRs from tree-based ML models using the Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values, which is a locally accurate and consistent methodology to quantify explanatory variables' contribution to predictions. Methods: We used three sets of publicly available survival data consisting of patients with colon, breast or pan cancer and compared the performance of CoxPH to the state-of-art ML model, XGBoost. To compute the HR for explanatory variables from the XGBoost model, the SHAP values were exponentiated and the ratio of the means over the two subgroups calculated. The confidence interval was computed via bootstrapping the training data and generating the ML model 1000 times. Across the three data sets, we systematically compared HRs for all explanatory variables. Open-source libraries in Python and R were used in the analyses. Results: For the colon and breast cancer data sets, the performance of CoxPH and XGBoost were comparable and we showed good consistency in the computed HRs. In the pan-cancer dataset, we showed agreement in most variables but also an opposite finding in two of the explanatory variables between the CoxPH and XGBoost result. Subsequent Kaplan-Meier plots supported the finding of the XGBoost model. Conclusion: Enabling the derivation of HR from ML models can help to improve the identification of risk factors from complex survival datasets and enhance the prediction of clinical trial outcomes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑