arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2102.00314cs.LGcs.CCstat.ML
收藏

用神经网络逼近良性函数的尺度和深度分离

Size and Depth Separation in Approximating Benign Functions with Neural Networks

Weizmann Institute of Science(魏茨曼科学研究所);Worcester Polytechnic Institute(伍斯特理工学院);University of Toronto(多伦多大学);IAS(高等研究院)

Gal Vardi, Daniel Reichman, Toniann Pitassi, Ohad Shamir

摘要:

When studying the expressive power of neural networks , a main challenge is to understand how the size and depth of the network affect its ability to approximate real functions. However, not all functions are interesting from a practical viewpoint: functions of interest usually have a polynomially-bounded Lipschitz constant, and can be computed efficiently. We call functions that satisfy these conditions "benign", and explore the benefits of size and depth for approximation of benign functions with ReLU networks. As we show, this problem is more challenging than the corresponding problem for non-benign functions. We give barriers to showing depth-lower-bounds: Proving existence of a benign function that cannot be approximated by polynomial-size networks of depth $4$ would settle longstanding open problems in computational complexity . It implies that beyond depth $4$ there is a barrier to showing depth-separation for benign functions, even between networks of constant depth and networks of nonconstant depth. We also study size-separation, namely, whether there are benign functions that can be approximated with networks of size $O(s(d))$ , but not with networks of size $O(s'(d))$ . We show a complexity-theoretic barrier to proving such results beyond size $O(d\log^2(d))$ , but also show an explicit benign function, that can be approximated with networks of size $O(d)$ and not with networks of size $o(d/\log d)$ . For approximation in $L_\infty$ we achieve such separation already between size $O(d)$ and size $o(d)$ . Moreover, we show superpolynomial size lower bounds and barriers to such lower bounds, depending on the assumptions on the function. Our size-separation results rely on an analysis of size lower bounds for Boolean functions, which is of independent interest: We show linear size lower bounds for computing explicit Boolean functions with neural networks and threshold circuits.

英文摘要:

When studying the expressive power of neural networks, a main challenge is to understand how the size and depth of the network affect its ability to approximate real functions. However, not all functions are interesting from a practical viewpoint: functions of interest usually have a polynomially-bounded Lipschitz constant, and can be computed efficiently. We call functions that satisfy these conditions "benign", and explore the benefits of size and depth for approximation of benign functions with ReLU networks. As we show, this problem is more challenging than the corresponding problem for non-benign functions. We give barriers to showing depth-lower-bounds: Proving existence of a benign function that cannot be approximated by polynomial-size networks of depth $4$ would settle longstanding open problems in computational complexity. It implies that beyond depth $4$ there is a barrier to showing depth-separation for benign functions, even between networks of constant depth and networks of nonconstant depth. We also study size-separation, namely, whether there are benign functions that can be approximated with networks of size $O(s(d))$, but not with networks of size $O(s'(d))$. We show a complexity-theoretic barrier to proving such results beyond size $O(d\log^2(d))$, but also show an explicit benign function, that can be approximated with networks of size $O(d)$ and not with networks of size $o(d/\log d)$. For approximation in $L_\infty$ we achieve such separation already between size $O(d)$ and size $o(d)$. Moreover, we show superpolynomial size lower bounds and barriers to such lower bounds, depending on the assumptions on the function. Our size-separation results rely on an analysis of size lower bounds for Boolean functions, which is of independent interest: We show linear size lower bounds for computing explicit Boolean functions with neural networks and threshold circuits.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑