arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2012.15859cs.CL
收藏

Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Bias

University of Edinburgh(爱丁堡大学);Rasa Technologies GmbH(Rasa技术公司);Heriot-Watt University(赫瑞-瓦特大学)

Seraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant, Rebecca Marchant, Ricardo Muñoz Sanchez, Mugdha Pandya, Adam Lopez

英文摘要:

Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems learn harmful societal biases that cause them to amplify inequality as they are deployed in more and more situations. To guide efforts at debiasing these systems, the NLP community relies on a variety of metrics that quantify bias in models. Some of these metrics are intrinsic, measuring bias in word embedding spaces, and some are extrinsic, measuring bias in downstream tasks that the word embeddings enable. Do these intrinsic and extrinsic metrics correlate with each other? We compare intrinsic and extrinsic metrics across hundreds of trained models covering different tasks and experimental conditions. Our results show no reliable correlation between these metrics that holds in all scenarios across tasks and languages. We urge researchers working on debiasing to focus on extrinsic measures of bias, and to make using these measures more feasible via creation of new challenge sets and annotated test data. To aid this effort, we release code, a new intrinsic metric, and an annotated test set focused on gender bias in hate speech.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑