arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.15613cs.CL

How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Models

Technical University of Darmstadt(达姆施塔特工业大学);University of Cambridge(剑桥大学);DeepMind(深度思维);University of Copenhagen(哥本哈根大学)

Phillip Rust, Jonas Pfeiffer, Ivan Vulić, Sebastian Ruder, Iryna Gurevych

英文摘要:

In this work, we provide a systematic and comprehensive empirical comparison of pretrained multilingual language models versus their monolingual counterparts with regard to their monolingual task performance. We study a set of nine typologically diverse languages with readily available pretrained monolingual models on a set of five diverse monolingual downstream tasks. We first aim to establish, via fair and controlled comparisons, if a gap between the multilingual and the corresponding monolingual representation of that language exists, and subsequently investigate the reason for any performance difference. To disentangle conflating factors, we train new monolingual models on the same data, with monolingually and multilingually trained tokenizers. We find that while the pretraining data size is an important factor, a designated monolingual tokenizer plays an equally important role in the downstream performance. Our results show that languages that are adequately represented in the multilingual model's vocabulary exhibit negligible performance decreases over their monolingual counterparts. We further find that replacing the original multilingual tokenizer with the specialized monolingual tokenizer improves the downstream performance of the multilingual model for almost every task and language.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑