arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.14672cs.CV

Tips and Tricks for Webly-Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition: Learning from the WebFG 2020 Challenge

Nanjing University of Science and Technology(南京理工大学);Netease Games AI Lab(网易游戏AI实验室);Netease Yidun AI Lab(网易易盾AI实验室);DiDi Safety and Security Technology Group (DiDi-SSTG)(滴滴安全技术集团)
Xiu-Shen Wei, Yu-Yan Xu, Yazhou Yao, Jia Wei, Si Xi, Wenyuan Xu, Weidong Zhang, Xiaoxin Lv, Dengpan Fu, Qing Li, Baoying Chen, Haojie Guo, Taolue Xue, Haipeng J… 展开作者

Xiu-Shen Wei, Yu-Yan Xu, Yazhou Yao, Jia Wei, Si Xi, Wenyuan Xu, Weidong Zhang, Xiaoxin Lv, Dengpan Fu, Qing Li, Baoying Chen, Haojie Guo, Taolue Xue, Haipeng Jing, Zhiheng Wang, Tianming Zhang, Mingwen Zhang

英文摘要:

WebFG 2020 is an international challenge hosted by Nanjing University of Science and Technology, University of Edinburgh, Nanjing University, The University of Adelaide, Waseda University, etc. This challenge mainly pays attention to the webly-supervised fine-grained recognition problem. In the literature, existing deep learning methods highly rely on large-scale and high-quality labeled training data, which poses a limitation to their practicability and scalability in real world applications. In particular, for fine-grained recognition, a visual task that requires professional knowledge for labeling, the cost of acquiring labeled training data is quite high. It causes extreme difficulties to obtain a large amount of high-quality training data. Therefore, utilizing free web data to train fine-grained recognition models has attracted increasing attentions from researchers in the fine-grained community. This challenge expects participants to develop webly-supervised fine-grained recognition methods, which leverages web images in training fine-grained recognition models to ease the extreme dependence of deep learning methods on large-scale manually labeled datasets and to enhance their practicability and scalability. In this technical report, we have pulled together the top WebFG 2020 solutions of total 54 competing teams, and discuss what methods worked best across the set of winning teams, and what surprisingly did not help.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑