arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.13214cs.ITmath.IT
收藏

错误信息时代:语义授权沟通的使能者

The Age of Incorrect Information: an Enabler of Semantics-Empowered Communication

Ali Maatouk, Mohamad Assaad, Anthony Ephremides

摘要:

在本文中,我们介绍了不正确的信息时代(AoII)作为语义授权的通信,一个新倡导的通信范式围绕数据的作用和它的有用性的通信目标的使能者。首先,我们揭示了传统的通信模式,其角色盲的数据方法,是容易受到性能瓶颈。接下来,我们强调了几个建议的性能指标的缺点注定要处理传统的通信范式的局限性,即信息时代(AoI)和基于错误的度量。我们还展示了AoII如何解决这些缺点,并更有意义地捕捉数据的目的。之后,我们考虑的问题,最小化的平均AoII在一个发射机-接收机对的情况。我们证明了最优传输策略是一个随机阈值策略,我们提出了一个算法,找到最优参数。此外,我们提供了AoII框架和标准的基于错误的度量对应之间的理论比较。有趣的是,我们表明,AoII最优策略也是错误最优的信息源模型。同时,反过来也不一定正确。最后,我们实现我们的政策在各种应用程序中,我们展示了它的性能优势相比,误差最优和AoI最优的政策。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we introduce the Age of Incorrect Information (AoII) as an enabler for semantics-empowered communication, a newly advocated communication paradigm centered around data's role and its usefulness to the communication's goal. First, we shed light on how the traditional communication paradigm, with its role-blind approach to data, is vulnerable to performance bottlenecks. Next, we highlight the shortcomings of several proposed performance measures destined to deal with the traditional communication paradigm's limitations, namely the Age of Information (AoI) and the error-based metrics. We also show how the AoII addresses these shortcomings and captures more meaningfully the purpose of data. Afterward, we consider the problem of minimizing the average AoII in a transmitter-receiver pair scenario. We prove that the optimal transmission strategy is a randomized threshold policy, and we propose an algorithm that finds the optimal parameters. Furthermore, we provide a theoretical comparison between the AoII framework and the standard error-based metrics counterpart. Interestingly, we show that the AoII-optimal policy is also error-optimal for the adopted information source model. Concurrently, the converse is not necessarily true. Finally, we implement our policy in various applications, and we showcase its performance advantages compared to both the error-optimal and the AoI-optimal policies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑