arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.09077cs.LGcs.AIcs.SC

Investigating ADR mechanisms with knowledge graph mining and explainable AI

Université de Lorraine(洛林大学);CNRS(法国国家科学研究中心);Inria(法国国家信息与自动化研究所);LORIA(洛林计算机科学及其应用实验室);Orange Labs(奥兰治实验室);LIMICS(LIMICS实验室);Inserm(法国国家健康与医学研究院);Université Sorbonne Paris Nord(索邦巴黎北大学);Sorbonne Université(索邦大学);CHU de St Etienne(圣艾蒂安大学附属医院);NGERE(NGERE实验室);Centre Régional de Pharmacovigilance(区域药物警戒中心);CHRU de Nancy(南锡大学区域医院中心);Inria Paris(法国国家信息与自动化研究所巴黎中心);Université de Paris(巴黎大学)

Emmanuel Bresso, Pierre Monnin, Cédric Bousquet, François-Elie Calvier, Ndeye-Coumba Ndiaye, Nadine Petitpain, Malika Smaïl-Tabbone, Adrien Coulet

英文摘要:

Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are characterized within randomized clinical trials and postmarketing pharmacovigilance, but their molecular mechanism remains unknown in most cases. Aside from clinical trials, many elements of knowledge about drug ingredients are available in open-access knowledge graphs. In addition, drug classifications that label drugs as either causative or not for several ADRs, have been established. We propose to mine knowledge graphs for identifying biomolecular features that may enable reproducing automatically expert classifications that distinguish drug causative or not for a given type of ADR. In an explainable AI perspective, we explore simple classification techniques such as Decision Trees and Classification Rules because they provide human-readable models, which explain the classification itself, but may also provide elements of explanation for molecular mechanisms behind ADRs. In summary, we mine a knowledge graph for features; we train classifiers at distinguishing, drugs associated or not with ADRs; we isolate features that are both efficient in reproducing expert classifications and interpretable by experts (i.e., Gene Ontology terms, drug targets, or pathway names); and we manually evaluate how they may be explanatory. Extracted features reproduce with a good fidelity classifications of drugs causative or not for DILI and SCAR. Experts fully agreed that 73% and 38% of the most discriminative features are possibly explanatory for DILI and SCAR, respectively; and partially agreed (2/3) for 90% and 77% of them. Knowledge graphs provide diverse features to enable simple and explainable models to distinguish between drugs that are causative or not for ADRs. In addition to explaining classifications, most discriminative features appear to be good candidates for investigating ADR mechanisms further.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑