arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.07396cs.CLeess.AS
收藏

使用弱监督实现语音中关键词的本地化

Towards localisation of keywords in speech using weak supervision

Stellenbosch University(斯泰伦博斯大学)

Kayode Olaleye, Benjamin van Niekerk, Herman Kamper

摘要:

弱监督和自监督模型的发展可以使语音技术在低资源环境中,完全transmittance不可用。我们考虑是否关键字本地化是可能的,使用两种形式的弱监督的位置信息没有明确提供。在第一种情况下,仅指示单词的存在或不存在,即词袋(BoW)标记。在第二种情况下,视觉上下文以与未标记的话语配对的图像的形式提供;然后需要使用配对的数据以自监督的方式训练模型。对于关键字本地化,我们采用了通常用于视觉领域的基于显着性的方法。我们将其与现有的技术进行比较,该技术将本地化作为网络架构的一部分。虽然基于显着性的方法更灵活(它可以在没有架构限制的情况下应用),但我们在使用它进行关键字本地化时发现了一个关键限制。在这两种形式的监督中,视觉训练模型的表现比BoW训练模型差。我们定性地表明,视觉训练模型有时会定位语义相关的单词,但这并不一致。虽然我们的研究结果表明,有一些信号允许本地化,但它也要求其他本地化方法更好地匹配这些形式的弱监管。

英文摘要:

Developments in weakly supervised and self-supervised models could enable speech technology in low-resource settings where full transcriptions are not available. We consider whether keyword localisation is possible using two forms of weak supervision where location information is not provided explicitly. In the first, only the presence or absence of a word is indicated, i.e. a bag-of-words (BoW) labelling. In the second, visual context is provided in the form of an image paired with an unlabelled utterance; a model then needs to be trained in a self-supervised fashion using the paired data. For keyword localisation, we adapt a saliency-based method typically used in the vision domain. We compare this to an existing technique that performs localisation as a part of the network architecture. While the saliency-based method is more flexible (it can be applied without architectural restrictions), we identify a critical limitation when using it for keyword localisation. Of the two forms of supervision, the visually trained model performs worse than the BoW-trained model. We show qualitatively that the visually trained model sometimes locate semantically related words, but this is not consistent. While our results show that there is some signal allowing for localisation, it also calls for other localisation methods better matched to these forms of weak supervision.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑