Action anticipation, intent prediction, and proactive behavior are all desirable characteristics for autonomous driving policies in interactive scenarios. Paramount, however, is ensuring safety on the road -- a key challenge in doing so is accounting for uncertainty in human driver actions without unduly impacting planner performance. This paper introduces a minimally-interventional safety controller operating within an autonomous vehicle control stack with the role of ensuring collision-free interaction with an externally controlled (e.g., human-driven) counterpart while respecting static obstacles such as a road boundary wall. We leverage reachability analysis to construct a real-time (100Hz) controller that serves the dual role of (i) tracking an input trajectory from a higher-level planning algorithm using model predictive control, and (ii) assuring safety by maintaining the availability of a collision-free escape maneuver as a persistent constraint regardless of whatever future actions the other car takes. A full-scale steer-by-wire platform is used to conduct traffic weaving experiments wherein two cars, initially side-by-side, must swap lanes in a limited amount of time and distance, emulating cars merging onto/off of a highway. We demonstrate that, with our control stack, the autonomous vehicle is able to avoid collision even when the other car defies the planner's expectations and takes dangerous actions, either carelessly or with the intent to collide, and otherwise deviates minimally from the planned trajectory to the extent required to maintain safety.
Within a robot autonomy stack, the planner and controller are typically designed separately, and serve different purposes. As such, there is often a diffusion of responsibilities when it comes to ensuring safety for the robot. We propose that a planner and controller should share the same interpretation of safety but apply this knowledge in a different yet complementary way. To achieve this, we use Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability theory at the planning level to provide the robot planner with the foresight to avoid entering regions with possible inevitable collision. However, this alone does …
Safe and Performant Deployment of Autonomous Systems via Model Predictive Control and Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability Analysis
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California（电气与计算机工程系，南加州大学）；Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University（航空与航天系，斯坦福大学）；Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, New York University（电气与计算机工程系，纽约大学）
RTD-RAX: Fast, Safe Trajectory Planning for Systems under Unknown Disturbances
Georgia Institute of Technology（佐治亚理工学院）；School of Electrical and Computer Engineering（电子与计算机工程学院）；School of Mechanical Engineering（机械工程学院）；School of Civil and Environmental Engineering（土木与环境工程学院）
Recent advances in machine learning technologies and sensing have paved the way for the belief that safe, accessible, and convenient autonomous vehicles may be realized in the near future. Despite tremendous advances within this context, fundamental challenges around safety and reliability are limiting their arrival and comprehensive adoption. Autonomous vehicles are often tasked with operating in dynamic and uncertain environments. As a result, they often make use of highly complex components, such as machine learning approaches, to handle the nuances of sensing, actuation, and control. While…
University of California, Berkeley（加州大学伯克利分校）；Simon Fraser University（西蒙弗雷泽大学）
Safety assurance is a critical yet challenging aspect when developing self-driving technologies. Hamilton-Jacobi backward-reachability analysis is a formal verification tool for verifying the safety of dynamic systems in the presence of disturbances. However, the standard approach is too conservative to be applied to self-driving applications due to its worst-case assumption on humans' behaviors (i.e., guard against worst-case outcomes). In this work, we integrate a learning-based prediction algorithm and a game-theoretic human behavioral model to online update the conservativeness of backward…
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promising results in the motion planning of manipulators. However, no method guarantees the safety of highly dynamic obstacles, such as humans, in RL-based manipulator control. This lack of formal safety assurances prevents the application of RL for manipulators in real-world human environments. Therefore, we propose a shielding mechanism that ensures ISO-verified human safety while training and deploying RL algorithms on manipulators. We utilize a fast reachability analysis of humans and manipulators to guarantee that the manipulator comes to a compl…
