arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.01959cs.ROcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
收藏

面向机器人系统的人类触觉手势解释

Towards Human Haptic Gesture Interpretation for Robotic Systems

University of Pennsylvania(宾夕法尼亚大学);Stanford University(斯坦福大学)

Bibit Bianchini, Prateek Verma, Kenneth Salisbury

AI总结:

针对机器人缺乏触觉导致物理人机交互效率低的问题,本研究提出了四类触摸手势,利用机械臂内部腕部力-力矩传感器收集了力数据集,并发现基于原始数据的神经网络分类器在手势识别中表现最优。

摘要:

物理人机交互(pHRI)的效率和沟通性不如人人交互,一个关键原因是机器人系统缺乏提供丰富信息的触觉。解释人类触摸手势是一项微妙且具有挑战性的任务,人类与机器人能力之间存在巨大差距。在以往展示人类触摸识别能力的研究中,传感器、手势类别、特征集和分类算法的差异导致了不可迁移结果的聚合,以及明显缺乏统一标准。为了解决这一差距,本研究提出了:1)四类拟定的触摸手势,涵盖了文献中识别出的手势特征的重要子集;2)在一个常见的pHRI机械臂上,仅使用其内部腕部力-力矩传感器收集了一个广泛的力数据集;3)在该数据集上对特征集和分类算法的组合进行了详尽的性能比较。我们在测试集上证明了所提出的手势定义具有高分类准确率,并强调基于原始数据的神经网络分类器优于其他特征集和算法的组合。随附视频见:https://youtu.be/gJPVImNKU68

英文摘要:

Physical human-robot interactions (pHRI) are less efficient and communicative than human-human interactions, and a key reason is a lack of informative sense of touch in robotic systems. Interpreting human touch gestures is a nuanced, challenging task with extreme gaps between human and robot capability. Among prior works that demonstrate human touch recognition capability, differences in sensors, gesture classes, feature sets, and classification algorithms yield a conglomerate of non-transferable results and a glaring lack of a standard. To address this gap, this work presents 1) four proposed touch gesture classes that cover an important subset of the gesture characteristics identified in the literature, 2) the collection of an extensive force dataset on a common pHRI robotic arm with only its internal wrist force-torque sensor, and 3) an exhaustive performance comparison of combinations of feature sets and classification algorithms on this dataset. We demonstrate high classification accuracies among our proposed gesture definitions on a test set, emphasizing that neural net-work classifiers on the raw data outperform other combinations of feature sets and algorithms. The accompanying video is here: https://youtu.be/gJPVImNKU68

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑