arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2012.01672quant-ph

超密编码的刚性

Rigidity of superdense coding

Ashwin Nayak, Henry Yuen

AI总结:

本文证明超密编码任务的刚性,即任意协议局部等价于Bennett-Wiesner协议,并构造高维不等价协议及分析随机编码性能。

摘要:

Bennett和Wiesner著名的超密编码协议表明,通过仅发送一个量子比特并利用共享的EPR对,可以通信两比特的经典信息。我们的第一个结果是,实现此任务的任意协议(对发送方的编码操作或共享纠缠态的维度不作任何假设)在局部等价于经典的Bennett-Wiesner协议。换言之,超密编码任务是刚性的。特别地,我们证明发送方和接收方仅将额外纠缠(超出EPR对的部分)用作经典随机性的来源。我们还研究了高维超密编码的几个问题,其目标是通过发送一个d维量子态来通信d^2个可能消息之一,适用于一般维度d。与d=2的情况(即发送单个量子比特)不同,对于更高的d,可能存在不等价的超密编码协议。我们基于对所有d>2的不等价正交酉基的构造,提出了不等价协议的具体构造。最后,我们分析了编码算子独立地从酉群上的Haar测度中采样的超密编码协议的性能。我们的分析涉及对随机最大纠缠态的可区分性的界定,这可能具有独立的意义。

英文摘要:

The famous superdense coding protocol of Bennett and Wiesner demonstrates that it is possible to communicate two bits of classical information by sending only one qubit and using a shared EPR pair. Our first result is that an arbitrary protocol for achieving this task (where there are no assumptions on the sender's encoding operations or the dimension of the shared entangled state) is locally equivalent to the canonical Bennett-Wiesner protocol. In other words, the superdense coding task is rigid. In particular, we show that the sender and receiver only use additional entanglement (beyond the EPR pair) as a source of classical randomness. We also investigate several questions about higher-dimensional superdense coding, where the goal is to communicate one of $d^2$ possible messages by sending a $d$-dimensional quantum state, for general dimensions $d$. Unlike the $d=2$ case (i.e. sending a single qubit), there can be inequivalent superdense coding protocols for higher $d$. We present concrete constructions of inequivalent protocols, based on constructions of inequivalent orthogonal unitary bases for all $d > 2$. Finally, we analyze the performance of superdense coding protocols where the encoding operators are independently sampled from the Haar measure on the unitary group. Our analysis involves bounding the distinguishability of random maximally entangled states, which may be of independent interest.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑