arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2011.13874astro-ph.COhep-phnucl-ex
收藏

The Impact of New d(p,γ)He3 Rates on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

Tsung-Han Yeh, Keith A. Olive, Brian D. Fields

英文摘要:

We consider the effect on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) of new measurements of the $d(p,γ){}^3$He cross section by the LUNA Collaboration. These have an important effect on the primordial abundance of D/H which is also sensitive to the baryon density at the time of BBN. We have re-evaluated the thermal rate for this reaction, using a world average of cross section data, which we describe with model-independent polynomials; our results are in good agreement with a similar analysis by LUNA. We then perform a full likelihood analysis combining BBN and Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) likelihood chains using the new rate combined with previous measurements and compare with the results using previous rates. Concordance between BBN and CMB measurements of the anisotropy spectrum using the old rates was excellent. The predicted deuterium abundance at the Planck value of the baryon density was $({\rm D/H})_{\rm BBN+CMB}^{\rm old} = (2.57 \pm 0.13) \times 10^{-5}$ which can be compared with the value determined from quasar absorption systems $({\rm D/H})_{\rm obs} = (2.55 \pm 0.03) \times 10^{-5} $. Using the new rates we find $({\rm D/H})_{\rm BBN+CMB} = (2.51 \pm 0.11) \times 10^{-5}$. We thus find consistency among BBN theory, deuterium and ${}^4$He observations, and the CMB, when using reaction rates fit in our data-driven approach. We also find that the new reaction data tightens the constraints on the number of relativistic degrees of freedom during BBN, giving the effective number of light neutrino species $N_ν= 2.880 \pm 0.144$ in good agreement with the Standard Model of particle physics. Finally, we note that the observed deuterium abundance continues to be more precise than the BBN+CMB prediction, whose error budget is now dominated by $d(d,n){}^3$He and $d(d,p){}^{3}{\rm H}$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑