arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2011.13011cs.LGcs.CVeess.IV
收藏

Advancing diagnostic performance and clinical usability of neural networks via adversarial training and dual batch normalization

RWTH Aachen University(亚琛工业大学);University Hospital Düsseldorf(杜塞尔多夫大学医院);University Hospital Aachen(亚琛大学医院);ARISTRA GmbH(ARISTRA有限公司);The Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University(亚琛工业大学实验分子影像研究所);Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS(弗劳恩霍夫数字医学MEVIS研究所);Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), University Hospital RWTH Aachen(亚琛工业大学医院综合诊断中心)
Tianyu Han, Sven Nebelung, Federico Pedersoli, Markus Zimmermann, Maximilian Schulze-Hagen, Michael Ho, Christoph Haarburger, Fabian Kiessling, Christiane Kuhl,… 展开作者

Tianyu Han, Sven Nebelung, Federico Pedersoli, Markus Zimmermann, Maximilian Schulze-Hagen, Michael Ho, Christoph Haarburger, Fabian Kiessling, Christiane Kuhl, Volkmar Schulz, Daniel Truhn

英文摘要:

Unmasking the decision-making process of machine learning models is essential for implementing diagnostic support systems in clinical practice. Here, we demonstrate that adversarially trained models can significantly enhance the usability of pathology detection as compared to their standard counterparts. We let six experienced radiologists rate the interpretability of saliency maps in datasets of X-rays, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging scans. Significant improvements were found for our adversarial models, which could be further improved by the application of dual batch normalization. Contrary to previous research on adversarially trained models, we found that the accuracy of such models was equal to standard models when sufficiently large datasets and dual batch norm training were used. To ensure transferability, we additionally validated our results on an external test set of 22,433 X-rays. These findings elucidate that different paths for adversarial and real images are needed during training to achieve state of the art results with superior clinical interpretability.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑