arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2011.07130cs.HCcs.AI

Qualitative Investigation in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Bit More Insight from Social Science

College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University(德雷塞尔大学计算与信息学院)

Adam J. Johs, Denise E. Agosto, Rosina O. Weber

英文摘要:

We present a focused analysis of user studies in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) entailing qualitative investigation. We draw on social science corpora to suggest ways for improving the rigor of studies where XAI researchers use observations, interviews, focus groups, and/or questionnaires to capture qualitative data. We contextualize the presentation of the XAI papers included in our analysis according to the components of rigor described in the qualitative research literature: 1) underlying theories or frameworks, 2) methodological approaches, 3) data collection methods, and 4) data analysis processes. The results of our analysis support calls from others in the XAI community advocating for collaboration with experts from social disciplines to bolster rigor and effectiveness in user studies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑