We consider a recently introduced framework in which fairness is measured by worst-case outcomes across groups, rather than by the more standard differences between group outcomes. In this framework we provide provably convergent oracle-efficient learning algorithms (or equivalently, reductions to non-fair learning) for minimax group fairness. Here the goal is that of minimizing the maximum loss across all groups, rather than equalizing group losses. Our algorithms apply to both regression and classification settings and support both overall error and false positive or false negative rates as the fairness measure of interest. They also support relaxations of the fairness constraints, thus permitting study of the tradeoff between overall accuracy and minimax fairness. We compare the experimental behavior and performance of our algorithms across a variety of fairness-sensitive data sets and show empirical cases in which minimax fairness is strictly and strongly preferable to equal outcome notions.
In this work we formulate and formally characterize group fairness as a multi-objective optimization problem, where each sensitive group risk is a separate objective. We propose a fairness criterion where a classifier achieves minimax risk and is Pareto-efficient w.r.t. all groups, avoiding unnecessary harm, and can lead to the best zero-gap model if policy dictates so. We provide a simple optimization algorithm compatible with deep neural networks to satisfy these constraints. Since our method does not require test-time access to sensitive attributes, it can be applied to reduce worst-case cl…
University College London（伦敦大学学院）；Duke University（杜克大学）；Apple Inc.（苹果公司）
Federated learning is an increasingly popular paradigm that enables a large number of entities to collaboratively learn better models. In this work, we study minimax group fairness in federated learning scenarios where different participating entities may only have access to a subset of the population groups during the training phase. We formally analyze how our proposed group fairness objective differs from existing federated learning fairness criteria that impose similar performance across participants instead of demographic groups. We provide an optimization algorithm -- FedMinMax -- for so…
The use of machine learning models in consequential decision making often exacerbates societal inequity, in particular yielding disparate impact on members of marginalized groups defined by race and gender. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is widely used to evaluate the performance of a scoring function in machine learning, but is studied in algorithmic fairness less than other performance metrics. Due to the pairwise nature of the AUC, defining an AUC-based group fairness metric is pairwise-dependent and may involve both \emph{intra-group} and \emph{inter-group} AUCs. Importantly, consideri…
We extend the notion of minimax fairness in supervised learning problems to its natural conclusion: lexicographic minimax fairness (or lexifairness for short). Informally, given a collection of demographic groups of interest, minimax fairness asks that the error of the group with the highest error be minimized. Lexifairness goes further and asks that amongst all minimax fair solutions, the error of the group with the second highest error should be minimized, and amongst all of those solutions, the error of the group with the third highest error should be minimized, and so on. Despite its natur…
In this paper, we take a first step towards answering the question of how to design fair machine learning algorithms that are robust to adversarial attacks. Using a minimax framework, we aim to design an adversarially robust fair regression model that achieves optimal performance in the presence of an attacker who is able to add a carefully designed adversarial data point to the dataset or perform a rank-one attack on the dataset. By solving the proposed nonsmooth nonconvex-nonconcave minimax problem, the optimal adversary as well as the robust fairness-aware regression model are obtained. For…
Price of Fairness in Bandits: A Tight Minimax Characterization
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur（印度理工学院卡拉格浦尔分校）；Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence（穆罕默德·本·扎耶德人工智能大学）；Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur（印度理工学院坎浦尔分校）
Data mining algorithms are increasingly used in automated decision making across all walks of daily life. Unfortunately, as reported in several studies these algorithms inject bias from data and environment leading to inequitable and unfair solutions. To mitigate bias in machine learning, different formalizations of fairness have been proposed that can be categorized into group fairness and individual fairness. Group fairness requires that different groups should be treated similarly which might be unfair to some individuals within a group. On the other hand, individual fairness requires that …
Federated learning (FL) has emerged as an important machine learning paradigm where a global model is trained based on the private data from distributed clients. However, most of existing FL algorithms cannot guarantee the performance fairness towards different groups because of data distribution shift over groups. In this paper, we formulate the problem of unified group fairness on FL, where the groups can be formed by clients (including existing clients and newly added clients) and sensitive attribute(s). To solve this problem, we first propose a general fair federated framework. Then we con…
From Fragile to Certified: Wasserstein Audits of Group Fairness Under Distribution Shift
Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems（马克斯·普朗克智能系统研究所）；Tübingen AI Center（图宾根人工智能中心）；Mila Québec AI Institute（魁北克人工智能研究所）；McGill University（麦吉尔大学）
Fairness-Aware Multi-Group Target Detection in Online Discussion
Dept. of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin（德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校计算机科学系）；Department of Data, Analytics, Technology, and Artificial Intelligence, ESADE（ESADE大学数据、分析、技术和人工智能系）；The Information School, The University of Texas at Austin（德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校信息学院）
Fix Representation (Optimally) Before Fairness: Finite-Sample Shrinkage Population Correction and the True Price of Fairness Under Subpopulation Shift
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA（生物统计学系，范德比尔特大学医学中心）；Department of Informatics, King's College London, WC2R 2LS London, UK（信息学系，国王学院伦敦）
Unveiling Group-Specific Distributed Concept Drift: A Fairness Imperative in Federated Learning
CISUC/LASI - Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Coimbra（科瓦姆布拉大学信息与系统中心/实验室，信息工程系，科瓦姆布拉大学）；INESC TEC and the Faculty of Economy, University of Porto（INESC TEC和波尔图大学经济学院）；Institute of Systems and Robotics, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Coimbra（系统与机器人研究所，电子与计算机工程系，科瓦姆布拉大学）
We consider the problem of improving fairness when one lacks access to a dataset labeled with protected groups, making it difficult to take advantage of strategies that can improve fairness but require protected group labels, either at training or runtime. To address this, we investigate improving fairness metrics for proxy groups, and test whether doing so results in improved fairness for the true sensitive groups. Results on benchmark and real-world datasets demonstrate that such a proxy fairness strategy can work well in practice. However, we caution that the effectiveness likely depends on…
The applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) surround decisions on increasingly many aspects of human lives. Society responds by imposing legal and social expectations for the accountability of such automated decision systems (ADSs). Fairness, a fundamental constituent of AI accountability, is concerned with just treatment of individuals and sensitive groups (e.g., based on sex, race). While many studies focus on fair learning and fairness testing for the classification tasks, the literature is rather limited on how to examine fairness in regression tasks. This work presents error parity a…
Massachusetts Institute of Technology（麻省理工学院）；University of Toronto（多伦多大学）；University of Tübingen（蒂宾根大学）；University of Adelaide（阿德莱德大学）；Stanford University（斯坦福大学）
Deep learning models have reached or surpassed human-level performance in the field of medical imaging, especially in disease diagnosis using chest x-rays. However, prior work has found that such classifiers can exhibit biases in the form of gaps in predictive performance across protected groups. In this paper, we question whether striving to achieve zero disparities in predictive performance (i.e. group fairness) is the appropriate fairness definition in the clinical setting, over minimax fairness, which focuses on maximizing the performance of the worst-case group. We benchmark the performan…
UC Berkeley（加州大学伯克利分校）；Google Research Accra（谷歌研究院阿克拉分部）；Illinois（伊利诺伊大学）
In algorithmically fair prediction problems, a standard goal is to ensure the equality of fairness metrics across multiple overlapping groups simultaneously. We reconsider this standard fair classification problem using a probabilistic population analysis, which, in turn, reveals the Bayes-optimal classifier. Our approach unifies a variety of existing group-fair classification methods and enables extensions to a wide range of non-decomposable multiclass performance metrics and fairness measures. The Bayes-optimal classifier further inspires consistent procedures for algorithmically fair classi…
Many existing fairness criteria for machine learning involve equalizing some metric across protected groups such as race or gender. However, practitioners trying to audit or enforce such group-based criteria can easily face the problem of noisy or biased protected group information. First, we study the consequences of naively relying on noisy protected group labels: we provide an upper bound on the fairness violations on the true groups G when the fairness criteria are satisfied on noisy groups $\hat{G}$. Second, we introduce two new approaches using robust optimization that, unlike the naive …
Zurich University of Applied Sciences（苏黎世应用科学大学）；University of Zurich（苏黎世大学）
While the field of algorithmic fairness has brought forth many ways to measure and improve the fairness of machine learning models, these findings are still not widely used in practice. We suspect that one reason for this is that the field of algorithmic fairness came up with a lot of definitions of fairness, which are difficult to navigate. The goal of this paper is to provide data scientists with an accessible introduction to group fairness metrics and to give some insight into the philosophical reasoning for caring about these metrics. We will do this by considering in which sense socio-dem…
Samsung Electronics Co.（三星电子公司）；Konkuk University（建国大学）；Seoul National University（首尔国立大学）
As they have a vital effect on social decision-making, AI algorithms not only should be accurate and but also should not pose unfairness against certain sensitive groups (e.g., non-white, women). Various specially designed AI algorithms to ensure trained AI models to be fair between sensitive groups have been developed. In this paper, we raise a new issue that between-group fair AI models could treat individuals in a same sensitive group unfairly. We introduce a new concept of fairness so-called within-group fairness which requires that AI models should be fair for those in a same sensitive gr…
We study a novel problem of fairness in ranking aimed at minimizing the amount of individual unfairness introduced when enforcing group-fairness constraints. Our proposal is rooted in the distributional maxmin fairness theory, which uses randomization to maximize the expected satisfaction of the worst-off individuals. We devise an exact polynomial-time algorithm to find maxmin-fair distributions of general search problems (including, but not limited to, ranking), and show that our algorithm can produce rankings which, while satisfying the given group-fairness constraints, ensure that the maxim…
IBM Research（IBM研究院）；IBM Watson AI Platform（IBM沃森人工智能平台）
Whereas previous post-processing approaches for increasing the fairness of predictions of biased classifiers address only group fairness, we propose a method for increasing both individual and group fairness. Our novel framework includes an individual bias detector used to prioritize data samples in a bias mitigation algorithm aiming to improve the group fairness measure of disparate impact. We show superior performance to previous work in the combination of classification accuracy, individual fairness and group fairness on several real-world datasets in applications such as credit, employment…
IBM Research（IBM研究院）；Massachusetts Institute of Technology（麻省理工学院）
Mitigating algorithmic bias is a critical task in the development and deployment of machine learning models. While several toolkits exist to aid machine learning practitioners in addressing fairness issues, little is known about the strategies practitioners employ to evaluate model fairness and what factors influence their assessment, particularly in the context of text classification. Two common approaches of evaluating the fairness of a model are group fairness and individual fairness. We run a study with Machine Learning practitioners (n=24) to understand the strategies used to evaluate mod…
Tel-Aviv University（特拉维夫大学）；Technion—Israel Institute of Technology（以色列理工学院）；Higher School of Economics（高等经济大学）
Machine Learning (ML) algorithms shape our lives. Banks use them to determine if we are good borrowers; IT companies delegate them recruitment decisions; police apply ML for crime-prediction, and judges base their verdicts on ML. However, real-world examples show that such automated decisions tend to discriminate against protected groups. This potential discrimination generated a huge hype both in media and in the research community. Quite a few formal notions of fairness were proposed, which take a form of constraints a "fair" algorithm must satisfy. We focus on scenarios where fairness is im…
Improving Group Fairness in Tensor Completion via Imbalance Mitigating Entity Augmentation
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA（计算机科学与工程系，加州大学河滨分校）；Siebel School of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA（计算与数据科学学院，伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校）
Auburn University（奥本大学）；JD.COM Silicon Valley Research Center（京东硅谷研究中心）
Only recently, researchers attempt to provide classification algorithms with provable group fairness guarantees. Most of these algorithms suffer from harassment caused by the requirement that the training and deployment data follow the same distribution. This paper proposes an input-agnostic certified group fairness algorithm, FairSmooth, for improving the fairness of classification models while maintaining the remarkable prediction accuracy. A Gaussian parameter smoothing method is developed to transform base classifiers into their smooth versions. An optimal individual smooth classifier is l…
Mila – Quebec AI Institute（Mila – 魁北克人工智能研究所）；HEC Montréal（蒙特利尔高等商学院）；University of Washington Tacoma（华盛顿大学塔科马分校）；Ghent University（根特大学）
Group fairness ensures that the outcome of machine learning (ML) based decision making systems are not biased towards a certain group of people defined by a sensitive attribute such as gender or ethnicity. Achieving group fairness in Federated Learning (FL) is challenging because mitigating bias inherently requires using the sensitive attribute values of all clients, while FL is aimed precisely at protecting privacy by not giving access to the clients' data. As we show in this paper, this conflict between fairness and privacy in FL can be resolved by combining FL with Secure Multiparty Computa…
Carnegie Mellon University（卡内基梅隆大学）；JP Morgan（摩根大通）；JP Morgan AI Research（摩根大通人工智能研究院）；Determined AI
Group fairness, a class of fairness notions that measure how different groups of individuals are treated differently according to their protected attributes, has been shown to conflict with one another, often with a necessary cost in loss of model's predictive performance. We propose a general diagnostic that enables systematic characterization of these trade-offs in group fairness. We observe that the majority of group fairness notions can be expressed via the fairness-confusion tensor, which is the confusion matrix split according to the protected attribute values. We frame several optimizat…
Motivated by scenarios where data is used for diverse prediction tasks, we study whether fair representation can be used to guarantee fairness for unknown tasks and for multiple fairness notions simultaneously. We consider seven group fairness notions that cover the concepts of independence, separation, and calibration. Against the backdrop of the fairness impossibility results, we explore approximate fairness. We prove that, although fair representation might not guarantee fairness for all prediction tasks, it does guarantee fairness for an important subset of tasks -- the tasks for which the…
