arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2011.02407cs.LGcs.CYecon.EM
收藏

Debiasing classifiers: is reality at variance with expectation?

Birla Institute of Technology and Science(贝拉理工学院);Ludwig-Maximilians-University(路德维希-马克西米利安大学);J.P. Morgan(摩根大通);J.P. Morgan AI Research(摩根大通人工智能研究院);University of Warwick(华威大学)

Ashrya Agrawal, Florian Pfisterer, Bernd Bischl, Francois Buet-Golfouse, Srijan Sood, Jiahao Chen, Sameena Shah, Sebastian Vollmer

英文摘要:

We present an empirical study of debiasing methods for classifiers, showing that debiasers often fail in practice to generalize out-of-sample, and can in fact make fairness worse rather than better. A rigorous evaluation of the debiasing treatment effect requires extensive cross-validation beyond what is usually done. We demonstrate that this phenomenon can be explained as a consequence of bias-variance trade-off, with an increase in variance necessitated by imposing a fairness constraint. Follow-up experiments validate the theoretical prediction that the estimation variance depends strongly on the base rates of the protected class. Considering fairness--performance trade-offs justifies the counterintuitive notion that partial debiasing can actually yield better results in practice on out-of-sample data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑