不符合目的：对“五个保险箱”的批判性分析
Not fit for Purpose: A critical analysis of the 'Five Safes'
摘要：
澳大利亚、新西兰和英国的政府机构采用“五个保险箱”框架作为政策工具或体现在立法中，旨在管理发布个人信息衍生数据的风险。尽管它很受欢迎，但五个保险箱几乎没有经过法律或技术上的批判性分析。我们认为，五个保险箱是从根本上有缺陷的：从脱离现有的法律保护和挪用的安全概念，而不提供任何手段，更喜欢强有力的技术措施，以查看披露风险作为静态的时间，不需要重复评估。“五个保险箱”几乎没有提供任何信心，即由此产生的数据共享是使用“安全”最佳实践或出于公共利益服务的目的进行的。
英文摘要：
Adopted by government agencies in Australia, New Zealand and the UK as policy instrument or as embodied into legislation, the 'Five Safes' framework aims to manage risks of releasing data derived from personal information. Despite its popularity, the Five Safes has undergone little legal or technical critical analysis. We argue that the Fives Safes is fundamentally flawed: from being disconnected from existing legal protections and appropriation of notions of safety without providing any means to prefer strong technical measures, to viewing disclosure risk as static through time and not requiring repeat assessment. The Five Safes provides little confidence that resulting data sharing is performed using 'safety' best practice or for purposes in service of public interest.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
