arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2011.00802cs.CLcs.LG

Hierarchical Bi-Directional Self-Attention Networks for Paper Review Rating Recommendation

Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago(伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校计算机科学系);Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data and Brain Computing, Beihang University(北京航空航天大学大数据与脑计算北京高等创新中心);School of Cyber Science and Technology, Beihang University(北京航空航天大学网络空间安全学院);Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Lehigh University(里海大学计算机科学与工程系)

Zhongfen Deng, Hao Peng, Congying Xia, Jianxin Li, Lifang He, Philip S. Yu

英文摘要:

Review rating prediction of text reviews is a rapidly growing technology with a wide range of applications in natural language processing. However, most existing methods either use hand-crafted features or learn features using deep learning with simple text corpus as input for review rating prediction, ignoring the hierarchies among data. In this paper, we propose a Hierarchical bi-directional self-attention Network framework (HabNet) for paper review rating prediction and recommendation, which can serve as an effective decision-making tool for the academic paper review process. Specifically, we leverage the hierarchical structure of the paper reviews with three levels of encoders: sentence encoder (level one), intra-review encoder (level two) and inter-review encoder (level three). Each encoder first derives contextual representation of each level, then generates a higher-level representation, and after the learning process, we are able to identify useful predictors to make the final acceptance decision, as well as to help discover the inconsistency between numerical review ratings and text sentiment conveyed by reviewers. Furthermore, we introduce two new metrics to evaluate models in data imbalance situations. Extensive experiments on a publicly available dataset (PeerRead) and our own collected dataset (OpenReview) demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approach compared with state-of-the-art methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑