arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2010.13049cs.CL

Commonsense knowledge adversarial dataset that challenges ELECTRA

NTU-Alibaba JRI Singapore(南洋理工大学-阿里巴巴联合研究院新加坡);Victoria University, Melbourne Australia(澳大利亚维多利亚大学);Alibaba, Beijing China(阿里巴巴(中国北京));Shandong University, Shandong China(山东大学(中国山东));Nanyang Technological University, Singapore(南洋理工大学)

Gongqi Lin, Yuan Miao, Xiaoyong Yang, Wenwu Ou, Lizhen Cui, Wei Guo, Chunyan Miao

英文摘要:

Commonsense knowledge is critical in human reading comprehension. While machine comprehension has made significant progress in recent years, the ability in handling commonsense knowledge remains limited. Synonyms are one of the most widely used commonsense knowledge. Constructing adversarial dataset is an important approach to find weak points of machine comprehension models and support the design of solutions. To investigate machine comprehension models' ability in handling the commonsense knowledge, we created a Question and Answer Dataset with common knowledge of Synonyms (QADS). QADS are questions generated based on SQuAD 2.0 by applying commonsense knowledge of synonyms. The synonyms are extracted from WordNet. Words often have multiple meanings and synonyms. We used an enhanced Lesk algorithm to perform word sense disambiguation to identify synonyms for the context. ELECTRA achieves the state-of-art result on the SQuAD 2.0 dataset in 2019. With scale, ELECTRA can achieve similar performance as BERT does. However, QADS shows that ELECTRA has little ability to handle commonsense knowledge of synonyms. In our experiment, ELECTRA-small can achieve 70% accuracy on SQuAD 2.0, but only 20% on QADS. ELECTRA-large did not perform much better. Its accuracy on SQuAD 2.0 is 88% but dropped significantly to 26% on QADS. In our earlier experiments, BERT, although also failed badly on QADS, was not as bad as ELECTRA. The result shows that even top-performing NLP models have little ability to handle commonsense knowledge which is essential in reading comprehension.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑