arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2010.04484cs.IR
收藏

Revisiting Alternative Experimental Settings for Evaluating Top-N Item Recommendation Algorithms

Wayne Xin Zhao, Junhua Chen, Pengfei Wang, Qi Gu, Ji-Rong Wen

英文摘要:

Top-N item recommendation has been a widely studied task from implicit feedback. Although much progress has been made with neural methods, there is increasing concern on appropriate evaluation of recommendation algorithms. In this paper, we revisit alternative experimental settings for evaluating top-N recommendation algorithms, considering three important factors, namely dataset splitting, sampled metrics and domain selection. We select eight representative recommendation algorithms (covering both traditional and neural methods) and construct extensive experiments on a very large dataset. By carefully revisiting different options, we make several important findings on the three factors, which directly provide useful suggestions on how to appropriately set up the experiments for top-N item recommendation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑