arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2010.03341cs.CV
收藏

深度学习在糖尿病足溃疡检测中的综合评价

Deep Learning in Diabetic Foot Ulcers Detection: A Comprehensive Evaluation

Manchester Metropolitan University(曼彻斯特城市大学);Keio University(庆应义塾大学);Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute(贝克心脏与糖尿病研究所);University of Applied Sciences and Arts Dortmund (FH Dortmund)(多特蒙德应用科学与艺术大学);Dartmouth College(达特茅斯学院);Shanghai University(上海大学)
Moi Hoon Yap, Ryo Hachiuma, Azadeh Alavi, Raphael Brungel, Bill Cassidy, Manu Goyal, Hongtao Zhu, Johannes Ruckert, Moshe Olshansky, Xiao Huang, Hideo Saito, Sa… 展开作者

Moi Hoon Yap, Ryo Hachiuma, Azadeh Alavi, Raphael Brungel, Bill Cassidy, Manu Goyal, Hongtao Zhu, Johannes Ruckert, Moshe Olshansky, Xiao Huang, Hideo Saito, Saeed Hassanpour, Christoph M. Friedrich, David Ascher, Anping Song, Hiroki Kajita, David Gillespie, Neil D. Reeves, Joseph Pappachan, Claire O'Shea, Eibe Frank

摘要:

已经有大量的研究涉及用于检测和识别糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的计算机方法和技术,但是缺乏对应用于该问题的最先进的深度学习目标检测框架的系统比较。DFUC 2020为参与者提供了一个全面的数据集,包括2,000张用于训练的图像和2,000张用于测试的图像。本文通过比较获奖团队提出的基于深度学习的算法来总结DFUC 2020的结果:Faster R-CNN,Faster R-CNN的三种变体和集成方法; YOLOv 3; YOLOv 5; EfficientDet;和一个新的级联注意力网络。对于每一种深度学习方法,我们都提供了模型架构、训练参数设置以及包括预处理、数据增强和后处理在内的附加阶段的详细描述。我们对每种方法进行了全面的评估。所有的方法都需要一个数据增强阶段来增加可用于训练的图像数量,并需要一个后处理阶段来消除误报。最佳性能来自可变形卷积,这是Faster R-CNN的变体,平均精度(mAP)为0.6940,F1得分为0.7434。最后,我们证明了基于不同深度学习方法的集成方法可以提高F1-Score,但不能提高mAP。

英文摘要:

There has been a substantial amount of research involving computer methods and technology for the detection and recognition of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), but there is a lack of systematic comparisons of state-of-the-art deep learning object detection frameworks applied to this problem. DFUC2020 provided participants with a comprehensive dataset consisting of 2,000 images for training and 2,000 images for testing. This paper summarises the results of DFUC2020 by comparing the deep learning-based algorithms proposed by the winning teams: Faster R-CNN, three variants of Faster R-CNN and an ensemble method; YOLOv3; YOLOv5; EfficientDet; and a new Cascade Attention Network. For each deep learning method, we provide a detailed description of model architecture, parameter settings for training and additional stages including pre-processing, data augmentation and post-processing. We provide a comprehensive evaluation for each method. All the methods required a data augmentation stage to increase the number of images available for training and a post-processing stage to remove false positives. The best performance was obtained from Deformable Convolution, a variant of Faster R-CNN, with a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.6940 and an F1-Score of 0.7434. Finally, we demonstrate that the ensemble method based on different deep learning methods can enhanced the F1-Score but not the mAP.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑