arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2009.13010astro-ph.HE
收藏

解释ANITA异常事件的地下反射体的实验测试

Experimental tests of sub-surface reflectors as an explanation for the ANITA anomalous events

D. Smith, D. Z. Besson, C. Deaconu, S. Prohira, P. Allison, L. Batten, J. J. Beatty, W. R. Binns, V. Bugaev, P. Cao, C. Chen, P. Chen, J. M. Clem, A. Connolly, … 展开作者

D. Smith, D. Z. Besson, C. Deaconu, S. Prohira, P. Allison, L. Batten, J. J. Beatty, W. R. Binns, V. Bugaev, P. Cao, C. Chen, P. Chen, J. M. Clem, A. Connolly, L. Cremonesi, P. Dasgupta, P. W. Gorham, M. H. Israel, T. C. Liu, A. Ludwig, S. Matsuno, C. Miki, J. Nam, A. Novikov, R. J. Nichol, E. Oberla, R. Prechelt, B. F. Rauch, J. Russell, D. Saltzberg, D. Seckel, G. S. Varner, A. G. Vieregg, S. A. Wissel

摘要:

气球携带的ANITA实验旨在通过冰淋浴产生的无线电发射来探测超高能中微子。虽然最初的目的是在南极冰盖内的相互作用,ANITA也证明了自我触发的能力,无线电发射的超高能带电宇宙射线在地球大气层中相互作用。对于在南极冰盖上方产生的阵雨,在南极表面对下行无线电信号的反射应导致极性反转,然后在$\sim$ 35-40公里高度的ANITA吊舱上进行观测。ANITA已经公布了两个即将到来的宇宙射线的异常实例,它们的测量极性与$\sim$ 50 UHECR信号的剩余样本相反。如果观察到的陡峭的向上入射角(相对于水平方向25- 30度)是由于冰中中微子相互作用引起的,则需要非标准模型物理学,因为标准模型横截面将禁止中微子穿透地球所需的长弦。Shoemaker等人认为,冰川学效应可以解释观测到的急剧异常事件。我们在此考虑由Shoemaker等人提供的方案,并发现它们不受现有ANITA和HiCal实验数据的支持。我们注意到,最近报告的四个额外的近地平线异常ANITA-4事件,在$>3σ$的意义,是不符合他们的模型,这需要显着的信号传输到冰。

英文摘要:

The balloon-borne ANITA experiment is designed to detect ultra-high energy neutrinos via radio emissions produced by an in-ice shower. Although initially purposed for interactions within the Antarctic ice sheet, ANITA also demonstrated the ability to self-trigger on radio emissions from ultra-high energy charged cosmic rays interacting in the Earth's atmosphere. For showers produced above the Antarctic ice sheet, reflection of the down-coming radio signals at the Antarctic surface should result in a polarity inversion prior to subsequent observation at the $\sim$35-40 km altitude ANITA gondola. ANITA has published two anomalous instances of upcoming cosmic-rays with measured polarity opposite the remaining sample of $\sim$50 UHECR signals. The steep observed upwards incidence angles (25--30 degrees relative to the horizontal) require non-Standard Model physics if these events are due to in-ice neutrino interactions, as the Standard Model cross-section would otherwise prohibit neutrinos from penetrating the long required chord of Earth. Shoemaker et al. posit that glaciological effects may explain the steep observed anomalous events. We herein consider the scenarios offered by Shoemaker et al. and find them to be disfavored by extant ANITA and HiCal experimental data. We note that the recent report of four additional near-horizon anomalous ANITA-4 events, at $>3σ$ significance, are incompatible with their model, which requires significant signal transmission into the ice.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑