arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2009.09645cs.DScs.DC
收藏

树上分布式局部可检查问题的复杂度景观

The Complexity Landscape of Distributed Locally Checkable Problems on Trees

National University of Singapore(新加坡国立大学)

Yi-Jun Chang

AI总结:

研究树上局部可检查标签问题的复杂度间隙,证明对每个k≥2存在Θ(n^{1/(k-1)})与Θ(n^{1/k})之间的间隙,并给出判定算法,同时证明区分常数轮与线性轮问题是EXPTIME难的。

摘要:

最近的研究揭示了分布式计算LOCAL模型中局部可检查标签(LCL)问题的复杂度景观中存在间隙。例如,有界度图上任何LCL问题的确定性轮复杂度要么是$O(\log^\ast n)$,要么是$\Omega(\log n)$ [Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie, FOCS 2016]。LCL问题的复杂度景观现已相当清晰,但仍有一些问题未解决。对于有界度树,存在一个LCL问题,其轮复杂度为$\Theta(n^{1/k})$,其中$k$为正整数 [Chang and Pettie, FOCS 2017]。猜想在有界度树上,没有LCL问题的轮复杂度为$o(n^{1/(k-1)})$且$\omega(n^{1/k})$。截至目前,仅$k=2$的情况已被证明 [Balliu et al., DISC 2018]。在本文中,我们证明对于有界度树上的LCL问题,对于每个$k \geq 2$,确实存在$\Theta(n^{1/(k-1)})$和$\Theta(n^{1/k})$之间的间隙。我们的证明是构造性的,因为它提供了一个顺序算法,用于判定给定LCL问题属于间隙的哪一侧。我们还证明,在有界度树上区分$\Theta(1)$轮和$\Theta(n)$轮LCL问题是EXPTIME难的。这改进了先前的PSPACE难结果 [Balliu et al., PODC 2019]。

英文摘要:

Recent research revealed the existence of gaps in the complexity landscape of locally checkable labeling (LCL) problems in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. For example, the deterministic round complexity of any LCL problem on bounded-degree graphs is either $O(\log^\ast n)$ or $Ω(\log n)$ [Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie, FOCS 2016]. The complexity landscape of LCL problems is now quite well-understood, but a few questions remain open. For bounded-degree trees, there is an LCL problem with round complexity $Θ(n^{1/k})$ for each positive integer $k$ [Chang and Pettie, FOCS 2017]. It is conjectured that no LCL problem has round complexity $o(n^{1/(k-1)})$ and $ω(n^{1/k})$ on bounded-degree trees. As of now, only the case of $k = 2$ has been proved [Balliu et al., DISC 2018]. In this paper, we show that for LCL problems on bounded-degree trees, there is indeed a gap between $Θ(n^{1/(k-1)})$ and $Θ(n^{1/k})$ for each $k \geq 2$. Our proof is constructive in the sense that it offers a sequential algorithm that decides which side of the gap a given LCL problem belongs to. We also show that it is EXPTIME-hard to distinguish between $Θ(1)$-round and $Θ(n)$-round LCL problems on bounded-degree trees. This improves upon a previous PSPACE-hardness result [Balliu et al., PODC 2019].

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑