arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2009.03098cs.CVcs.AI
收藏

Progressive Bilateral-Context Driven Model for Post-Processing Person Re-Identification

Soochow University(苏州大学);Institute of Automation Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院自动化研究所);Fraunhofer IGD(弗劳恩霍夫计算机图形研究所);Nanjing University of Science and Technology(南京理工大学);TU Darmstadt(达姆施塔特工业大学)

Min Cao, Chen Chen, Hao Dou, Xiyuan Hu, Silong Peng, Arjan Kuijper

英文摘要:

Most existing person re-identification methods compute pairwise similarity by extracting robust visual features and learning the discriminative metric. Owing to visual ambiguities, these content-based methods that determine the pairwise relationship only based on the similarity between them, inevitably produce a suboptimal ranking list. Instead, the pairwise similarity can be estimated more accurately along the geodesic path of the underlying data manifold by exploring the rich contextual information of the sample. In this paper, we propose a lightweight post-processing person re-identification method in which the pairwise measure is determined by the relationship between the sample and the counterpart's context in an unsupervised way. We translate the point-to-point comparison into the bilateral point-to-set comparison. The sample's context is composed of its neighbor samples with two different definition ways: the first order context and the second order context, which are used to compute the pairwise similarity in sequence, resulting in a progressive post-processing model. The experiments on four large-scale person re-identification benchmark datasets indicate that (1) the proposed method can consistently achieve higher accuracies by serving as a post-processing procedure after the content-based person re-identification methods, showing its state-of-the-art results, (2) the proposed lightweight method only needs about 6 milliseconds for optimizing the ranking results of one sample, showing its high-efficiency. Code is available at: https://github.com/123ci/PBCmodel.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑