基于穆拉·萨德拉哲学重构威廉·莱恩·克雷格的绝对时间解释
Reconstructing William Lane Craig's Explanation of Absolute Time based on Mulla Sadra's Philosophy
AI总结：
针对克雷格基于超自然预设的绝对时间诠释不具备科学性的问题，本文借助穆拉·萨德拉哲学的自然普遍实体运动概念重构其绝对时间解释，证明自然普遍时间，更好弥合了相关论证的形而上学与物理学层面的鸿沟。
摘要：
狭义相对论问世后，物理学界否定了自然界中绝对时间的存在。近几十年来，威廉·莱恩·克雷格（William Lane Craig）一直尝试在保留绝对时间概念的前提下，为支撑相对论的经验证据提供一种诠释。然而，他的诠释建立在超自然预设之上，因此无法被视为科学论证。本文在阐释克雷格观点的基础上，借助伊斯兰哲学最重要流派——穆拉·萨德拉（Mulla Sadra）哲学中著名的“自然普遍实体运动”概念，尝试重构其对绝对时间的解释，以此证明自然界的普遍时间。尽管克雷格在论证绝对时间时参考了部分现代物理学证据，但本文在指出相关证据后，探讨了本文所用方法能更好地弥合该论证的形而上学层面与物理学层面之间存在的鸿沟。
英文摘要：
After the advent of the theory of special relativity, the existence of absolute time in nature was rejected within the society of physics. In recent decades, William Lane Craig has endeavoured to offer an interpretation of the empirical evidence that support the theory of relativity while maintaining the concept of absolute time. His interpretation, however, is based upon supernatural presuppositions due to which it cannot be accepted as a scientific argument. Here, after explaining Craig's view, we attempt to reconstruct his explanation for absolute time using the concept of general substantial motion of nature, well-known in Mulla Sadra's philosophy as the most important approach in Islamic philosophy; thereby, proving general time for the natural world. Although Craig considers some evidence from modern physics in his reasoning for absolute time, in this paper, after pointing to some evidence, it is discussed that the approach used here better bridges the gap that exists between the metaphysics and the physics of the argument.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
