arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2008.12477econ.EMstat.APstat.ML
收藏

机器学习对宏观经济预测有何帮助?

How is Machine Learning Useful for Macroeconomic Forecasting?

Philippe Goulet Coulombe, Maxime Leroux, Dalibor Stevanovic, Stéphane Surprenant

摘要:

我们超越了“机器学习对宏观经济预测有用吗?“而加入“如何”。目前的预测文献集中在匹配特定的变量和视野与一个特别成功的算法。相比之下,我们研究了推动ML收益的基础特征相对于标准宏观经济计量方法的有用性。我们区分了四个所谓的特征(非线性,正则化,交叉验证和替代损失函数),并研究了它们在数据丰富和数据贫乏环境中的行为。为此,我们设计了实验,以确定感兴趣的“治疗”效果。我们的结论是:(i)非线性是宏观经济预测的真正游戏规则改变者,(ii)标准因子模型仍然是最好的正则化,(iii)K折交叉验证是最佳实践,(iv)$L_2$优于$\bar ε$ -不敏感的样本内损失。非线性技术的预测收益与宏观经济的高度不确定性、金融压力和房地产泡沫破裂有关。这表明机器学习对于宏观经济预测是有用的,因为它主要捕捉在不确定性和金融摩擦背景下出现的重要非线性。

英文摘要:

We move beyond "Is Machine Learning Useful for Macroeconomic Forecasting?" by adding the "how". The current forecasting literature has focused on matching specific variables and horizons with a particularly successful algorithm. In contrast, we study the usefulness of the underlying features driving ML gains over standard macroeconometric methods. We distinguish four so-called features (nonlinearities, regularization, cross-validation and alternative loss function) and study their behavior in both the data-rich and data-poor environments. To do so, we design experiments that allow to identify the "treatment" effects of interest. We conclude that (i) nonlinearity is the true game changer for macroeconomic prediction, (ii) the standard factor model remains the best regularization, (iii) K-fold cross-validation is the best practice and (iv) the $L_2$ is preferred to the $\bar ε$-insensitive in-sample loss. The forecasting gains of nonlinear techniques are associated with high macroeconomic uncertainty, financial stress and housing bubble bursts. This suggests that Machine Learning is useful for macroeconomic forecasting by mostly capturing important nonlinearities that arise in the context of uncertainty and financial frictions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑