arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2008.11278cs.LGcs.CR
收藏

一种用于车载网络安全的对抗攻击防御系统

An Adversarial Attack Defending System for Securing In-Vehicle Networks

University of South Florida(南佛罗里达大学)

Yi Li, Jing Lin, Kaiqi Xiong

摘要:

在现代汽车中,有70多个电子控制单元(ECU)。对于车载网络,ECU通过遵循标准通信协议(例如控制器局域网(CAN))相互通信。但是,攻击者可以通过WLAN或蓝牙轻松访问车载网络,从而危及ECU。虽然有各种各样的深度学习(DL)方法被建议用于保护车载网络,但最近对对抗性示例的研究表明,攻击者可以很容易地欺骗DL模型。在这项研究中,我们进一步探索了车载网络中的对抗性示例。我们首先发现并实现了两个对抗攻击模型,它们对车载网络中使用的基于长短期记忆(LSTM)的检测模型有害。然后,我们提出了一个对抗攻击防御系统(AADS),用于保护车载网络。具体而言,我们专注于车载网络中与制动相关的ECU。我们的实验结果表明,对手可以很容易地攻击基于LSTM的检测模型的成功率超过98%,所提出的AADS实现了超过99%的准确率检测对抗攻击。

英文摘要:

In a modern vehicle, there are over seventy Electronics Control Units (ECUs). For an in-vehicle network, ECUs communicate with each other by following a standard communication protocol, such as Controller Area Network (CAN). However, an attacker can easily access the in-vehicle network to compromise ECUs through a WLAN or Bluetooth. Though there are various deep learning (DL) methods suggested for securing in-vehicle networks, recent studies on adversarial examples have shown that attackers can easily fool DL models. In this research, we further explore adversarial examples in an in-vehicle network. We first discover and implement two adversarial attack models that are harmful to a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM)-based detection model used in the in-vehicle network. Then, we propose an Adversarial Attack Defending System (AADS) for securing an in-vehicle network. Specifically, we focus on brake-related ECUs in an in-vehicle network. Our experimental results demonstrate that adversaries can easily attack the LSTM-based detection model with a success rate of over 98%, and the proposed AADS achieves over 99% accuracy for detecting adversarial attacks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑