PRINCIPIA：一个分散的同行评审生态系统
PRINCIPIA: a Decentralized Peer-Review Ecosystem
摘要：
同行评议是现代科学努力的基石。然而，越来越多的人一致认为，目前同行审查制度的一些局限性，从缺乏对审查者的激励到缺乏透明度，有可能破坏其好处。在这里，我们介绍了用于科学产出同行评审的PRINCIPIA（http：//www.principia.network/）框架（例如，论文、授权提案或专利）。该框架允许科学生态系统的主要参与者-包括现有的出版集团-通过建立一个自由的评论和出版物市场，创建和管理同行评审期刊。PRINCIPIA的推荐人根据他们的努力和评论的质量得到透明的奖励。PRINCIPIA还自然地允许识别用户和期刊的声誉，具有不依赖于第三方的内在声誉系统。PRINCIPIA重新平衡了研究人员和出版商之间的权力，鼓励评审员进行有价值的评估，促进期刊之间的公平竞争，降低获取研究成果和出版的成本。
英文摘要：
Peer review is a cornerstone of modern scientific endeavor. However, there is growing consensus that several limitations of the current peer review system, from lack of incentives to reviewers to lack of transparency, risks to undermine its benefits. Here, we introduce the PRINCIPIA (http://www.principia.network/) framework for peer-review of scientific outputs (e.g., papers, grant proposals or patents). The framework allows key players of the scientific ecosystem -- including existing publishing groups -- to create and manage peer-reviewed journals, by building a free market for reviews and publications. PRINCIPIA's referees are transparently rewarded according to their efforts and the quality of their reviews. PRINCIPIA also naturally allows to recognize the prestige of users and journals, with an intrinsic reputation system that does not depend on third-parties. PRINCIPIA re-balances the power between researchers and publishers, stimulates valuable assessments from referees, favors a fair competition between journals, and reduces the costs to access research output and to publish.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
