民主选举中失败的公理
Axioms for Defeat in Democratic Elections
AI总结:
本文提出六条民主选举失败公理,其中相干IIA弱化阿罗条件,并证明分裂循环是唯一满足这些公理的最明确失败判定方法,同时规避阿罗不可能定理。
摘要:
我们提出了六条公理,涉及在包含两名或更多候选人的民主选举中,一名候选人何时应击败另一名候选人。其中五条公理被已知的投票程序广泛满足。第六条公理是对肯尼斯·阿罗著名的无关备选方案独立性(IIA)条件的弱化。我们称这一弱化版本为“相干IIA”。我们证明,这五条公理加上相干IIA,唯一确定了我们在近期工作中研究的一种判定失败的方法:分裂循环。特别是,分裂循环在满足民主失败六条公理的所有方法中,提供了最明确的失败定义。此外,我们分析了分裂循环如何规避阿罗不可能定理及相关的不可能结果。
英文摘要:
We propose six axioms concerning when one candidate should defeat another in a democratic election involving two or more candidates. Five of the axioms are widely satisfied by known voting procedures. The sixth axiom is a weakening of Kenneth Arrow's famous condition of the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA). We call this weakening Coherent IIA. We prove that the five axioms plus Coherent IIA single out a method of determining defeats studied in our recent work: Split Cycle. In particular, Split Cycle provides the most resolute definition of defeat among any satisfying the six axioms for democratic defeat. In addition, we analyze how Split Cycle escapes Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and related impossibility results.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。