arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2008.07907q-fin.STq-fin.PMq-fin.PR
收藏

波动率取决于市场交易与宏观理论

Volatility Depends on Market Trades and Macro Theory

Victor Olkhov

AI总结:

本文从市场交易价值与交易量的随机性出发,推导价格和收益波动率的市场成因,并指出需建立二阶宏观理论以支撑波动率预测。

摘要:

我们将市场交易的随机性视为价格与收益随机性的根源。我们把平均区间Δ内的交易价值和交易量时间序列视为随机变量,并描述基于市场的价格和收益波动率对市场交易价值与交易量的波动率及相关性的依赖关系。我们描述了宏观经济变量精度下界的市场根源,并以宏观经济投资的精度为例加以考察。我们强调,当前宏观经济模型描述的是由交易价值或交易量之和决定的一阶变量之间的关系。为预测基于市场的价格、收益波动率以及宏观经济变量的波动率,应当发展计量经济学方法、收集数据,并建立对一阶与二阶经济变量相互依赖关系进行建模的二阶宏观经济理论。二阶宏观经济理论的缺失,意味着预测基于市场的价格和收益波动率以及任何宏观经济变量波动率都缺乏经济学基础。反过来,这使得价格、收益概率的预测精度以及宏观经济变量的精度在最好情况下也受限于高斯分布。

英文摘要:

We consider the randomness of market trade as the origin of price and return stochasticity. We look at time series of trade values and volumes as random variables during the averaging interval Δ and describe the dependences of market-based volatilities of price and return on the volatilities and correlations of market trade values and volumes. We describe the market-based origin of the lower boundaries of the accuracy of macroeconomic variables and consider, as an example, the accuracy of macroeconomic investments. We highlight that current macroeconomic models describe relations between the 1st order variables determined by sums of trade values or volumes. To predict market-based volatilities of price, return, and volatilities of macroeconomic variables, one should develop econometric methodologies, collect data, and elaborate macroeconomic theories of the 2nd order that model the mutual dependence of the 1st and 2nd order economic variables. The absence of macroeconomic theories of the 2nd order means no economic basis for predictions of market-based volatilities of price and return, as well as volatilities of any macroeconomic variables. In turn, that limits the accuracy of forecasting probabilities of price, return, and the accuracy of macroeconomic variables in the best case by Gaussian distributions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑