arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2008.04652cs.SIcs.DL
收藏

科学文章推荐:利用共同作者关系和历史偏好

Scientific Article Recommendation: Exploiting Common Author Relations and Historical Preferences

Feng Xia, Haifeng Liu, Ivan Lee, Longbing Cao

摘要:

在即将到来的学术大数据时代,科学文章推荐系统在研究人员检索感兴趣的科学文章方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。大多数现有的研究都为所有目标研究人员设计了统一的方法,因此无论研究人员处于何种情况,都运行相同的算法来为所有研究人员生成推荐。然而,不同的研究者可能有自己的特点,可能会有相应的方法,从而产生更好的建议。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的推荐方法,该方法结合了文章之间的共同作者关系信息(即,两篇文章的作者相同(S)。我们的方法的基本原理是,研究人员经常搜索由同一作者发表的文章。由于不是所有的研究人员都有这样的基于作者的搜索模式,我们提出了两个功能,这是基于对共同的作者关系和频繁出现的作者的文章的信息定义,以确定推荐的目标研究人员。我们在真实数据集上进行的大量实验表明,定义的特征可以有效地确定相关的目标研究人员,并且与基线方法相比,所提出的方法可以为相关研究人员生成更准确的建议。

英文摘要:

Scientific article recommender systems are playing an increasingly important role for researchers in retrieving scientific articles of interest in the coming era of big scholarly data. Most existing studies have designed unified methods for all target researchers and hence the same algorithms are run to generate recommendations for all researchers no matter which situations they are in. However, different researchers may have their own features and there might be corresponding methods for them resulting in better recommendations. In this paper, we propose a novel recommendation method which incorporates information on common author relations between articles (i.e., two articles with the same author(s)). The rationale underlying our method is that researchers often search articles published by the same author(s). Since not all researchers have such author-based search patterns, we present two features, which are defined based on information about pairwise articles with common author relations and frequently appeared authors, to determine target researchers for recommendation. Extensive experiments we performed on a real-world dataset demonstrate that the defined features are effective to determine relevant target researchers and the proposed method generates more accurate recommendations for relevant researchers when compared to a Baseline method.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑