arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2008.03533cs.CV
收藏

How Trustworthy are Performance Evaluations for Basic Vision Tasks?

Curtin University(科廷大学);Monash University(莫纳什大学);Stanford University(斯坦福大学);University of Adelaide(阿德莱德大学)

Tran Thien Dat Nguyen, Hamid Rezatofighi, Ba-Ngu Vo, Ba-Tuong Vo, Silvio Savarese, Ian Reid

英文摘要:

This paper examines performance evaluation criteria for basic vision tasks involving sets of objects namely, object detection, instance-level segmentation and multi-object tracking. The rankings of algorithms by an existing criterion can fluctuate with different choices of parameters, e.g. Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold, making their evaluations unreliable. More importantly, there is no means to verify whether we can trust the evaluations of a criterion. This work suggests a notion of trustworthiness for performance criteria, which requires (i) robustness to parameters for reliability, (ii) contextual meaningfulness in sanity tests, and (iii) consistency with mathematical requirements such as the metric properties. We observe that these requirements were overlooked by many widely-used criteria, and explore alternative criteria using metrics for sets of shapes. We also assess all these criteria based on the suggested requirements for trustworthiness.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑