arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2008.02001eess.IVcs.CV
收藏

Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Activity Segmentation with Attention-Guided Two-Path CNNs

Hamburg University of Technology(汉堡工业大学);jung diagnostics GmbH(jung diagnostics 有限公司);University Hospital Zurich(苏黎世大学医院);University of Zurich(苏黎世大学);Technische Universität Dresden(德累斯顿工业大学)

Nils Gessert, Julia Krüger, Roland Opfer, Ann-Christin Ostwaldt, Praveena Manogaran, Hagen H. Kitzler, Sven Schippling, Alexander Schlaefer

英文摘要:

Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory autoimmune demyelinating disease that is characterized by lesions in the central nervous system. Typically, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for tracking disease progression. Automatic image processing methods can be used to segment lesions and derive quantitative lesion parameters. So far, methods have focused on lesion segmentation for individual MRI scans. However, for monitoring disease progression, \textit{lesion activity} in terms of new and enlarging lesions between two time points is a crucial biomarker. For this problem, several classic methods have been proposed, e.g., using difference volumes. Despite their success for single-volume lesion segmentation, deep learning approaches are still rare for lesion activity segmentation. In this work, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are studied for lesion activity segmentation from two time points. For this task, CNNs are designed and evaluated that combine the information from two points in different ways. In particular, two-path architectures with attention-guided interactions are proposed that enable effective information exchange between the two time point's processing paths. It is demonstrated that deep learning-based methods outperform classic approaches and it is shown that attention-guided interactions significantly improve performance. Furthermore, the attention modules produce plausible attention maps that have a masking effect that suppresses old, irrelevant lesions. A lesion-wise false positive rate of 26.4% is achieved at a true positive rate of 74.2%, which is not significantly different from the interrater performance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑