arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2007.15422q-bio.QMcs.CVcs.LG

Few shot domain adaptation for in situ macromolecule structural classification in cryo-electron tomograms

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);Tsinghua University(清华大学);Chinese Academy of Science(中国科学院)

Liangyong Yu, Ran Li, Xiangrui Zeng, Hongyi Wang, Jie Jin, Ge Yang, Rui Jiang, Min Xu

英文摘要:

Motivation: Cryo-Electron Tomography (cryo-ET) visualizes structure and spatial organization of macromolecules and their interactions with other subcellular components inside single cells in the close-to-native state at sub-molecular resolution. Such information is critical for the accurate understanding of cellular processes. However, subtomogram classification remains one of the major challenges for the systematic recognition and recovery of the macromolecule structures in cryo-ET because of imaging limits and data quantity. Recently, deep learning has significantly improved the throughput and accuracy of large-scale subtomogram classification. However often it is difficult to get enough high-quality annotated subtomogram data for supervised training due to the enormous expense of labeling. To tackle this problem, it is beneficial to utilize another already annotated dataset to assist the training process. However, due to the discrepancy of image intensity distribution between source domain and target domain, the model trained on subtomograms in source domainmay perform poorly in predicting subtomogram classes in the target domain. Results: In this paper, we adapt a few shot domain adaptation method for deep learning based cross-domain subtomogram classification. The essential idea of our method consists of two parts: 1) take full advantage of the distribution of plentiful unlabeled target domain data, and 2) exploit the correlation between the whole source domain dataset and few labeled target domain data. Experiments conducted on simulated and real datasets show that our method achieves significant improvement on cross domain subtomogram classification compared with baseline methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑