Federated learning, as a distributed learning that conducts the training on the local devices without accessing to the training data, is vulnerable to Byzatine poisoning adversarial attacks. We argue that the federated learning model has to avoid those kind of adversarial attacks through filtering out the adversarial clients by means of the federated aggregation operator. We propose a dynamic federated aggregation operator that dynamically discards those adversarial clients and allows to prevent the corruption of the global learning model. We assess it as a defense against adversarial attacks deploying a deep learning classification model in a federated learning setting on the Fed-EMNIST Digits, Fashion MNIST and CIFAR-10 image datasets. The results show that the dynamic selection of the clients to aggregate enhances the performance of the global learning model and discards the adversarial and poor (with low quality models) clients.
To study the resilience of distributed learning, the "Byzantine" literature considers a strong threat model where workers can report arbitrary gradients to the parameter server. Whereas this model helped obtain several fundamental results, it has sometimes been considered unrealistic, when the workers are mostly trustworthy machines. In this paper, we show a surprising equivalence between this model and data poisoning, a threat considered much more realistic. More specifically, we prove that every gradient attack can be reduced to data poisoning, in any personalized federated learning system w…
University of California, San Diego（加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校）；University of Wisconsin, Madison（威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校）
Data poisoning attacks -- where an adversary can modify a small fraction of training data, with the goal of forcing the trained classifier to high loss -- are an important threat for machine learning in many applications. While a body of prior work has developed attacks and defenses, there is not much general understanding on when various attacks and defenses are effective. In this work, we undertake a rigorous study of defenses against data poisoning for online learning. First, we study four standard defenses in a powerful threat model, and provide conditions under which they can allow or res…
The Ohio State University（俄亥俄州立大学）；Duke University（杜克大学）
In federated learning, multiple client devices jointly learn a machine learning model: each client device maintains a local model for its local training dataset, while a master device maintains a global model via aggregating the local models from the client devices. The machine learning community recently proposed several federated learning methods that were claimed to be robust against Byzantine failures (e.g., system failures, adversarial manipulations) of certain client devices. In this work, we perform the first systematic study on local model poisoning attacks to federated learning. We as…
The Ohio State University（俄亥俄州立大学）；Duke University（杜克大学）；Air Force Research Laboratory（空军研究实验室）
Federated learning (FL) is an emerging machine learning paradigm, in which clients jointly learn a model with the help of a cloud server. A fundamental challenge of FL is that the clients are often heterogeneous, e.g., they have different computing powers, and thus the clients may send model updates to the server with substantially different delays. Asynchronous FL aims to address this challenge by enabling the server to update the model once any client's model update reaches it without waiting for other clients' model updates. However, like synchronous FL, asynchronous FL is also vulnerable t…
College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics（南京航空航天大学计算机科学与技术学院）；School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen（香港中文大学（深圳）理工学院）；Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society (AIRS)（深圳市人工智能与机器人研究院）
Federated learning (FL) is a promising privacy-preserving distributed machine learning methodology that allows multiple clients (i.e., workers) to collaboratively train statistical models without disclosing private training data. Due to the characteristics of data remaining localized and the uninspected on-device training process, there may exist Byzantine workers launching data poisoning and model poisoning attacks, which would seriously deteriorate model performance or prevent the model from convergence. Most of the existing Byzantine-robust FL schemes are either ineffective against several …
Shanghai JiaoTong University（上海交通大学）；The Hong Kong Polytechnic University（香港理工大学）
Neural network classifiers are vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, as attackers can degrade or even manipulate their predictions thorough poisoning only a few training samples. However, the robustness of heuristic defenses is hard to measure. Random selection based defenses can achieve certified robustness by averaging the classifiers' predictions on the sub-datasets sampled from the training set. This paper proposes a framework of random selection based certified defenses against data poisoning attacks. Specifically, we prove that the random selection schemes that satisfy certain conditions…
SoK: Benchmarking Poisoning Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning
Shanghai Jiao Tong University（上海交通大学）；Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)（香港科技大学（广州））；Tsinghua University（清华大学）；Jinan University（暨南大学）
Federated learning (FL) enables the training of models among distributed clients without compromising the privacy of training datasets, while the invisibility of clients datasets and the training process poses a variety of security threats. This survey provides the taxonomy of poisoning attacks and experimental evaluation to discuss the need for robust FL.
Data poisoning attacks aim at manipulating model behaviors through distorting training data. Previously, an aggregation-based certified defense, Deep Partition Aggregation (DPA), was proposed to mitigate this threat. DPA predicts through an aggregation of base classifiers trained on disjoint subsets of data, thus restricting its sensitivity to dataset distortions. In this work, we propose an improved certified defense against general poisoning attacks, namely Finite Aggregation. In contrast to DPA, which directly splits the training set into disjoint subsets, our method first splits the traini…
Mississippi State University（密西西比州立大学）；University of South Florida（南佛罗里达大学）；University of Oklahoma（俄克拉荷马大学）
Federated learning (FL) provides a high efficient decentralized machine learning framework, where the training data remains distributed at remote clients in a network. Though FL enables a privacy-preserving mobile edge computing framework using IoT devices, recent studies have shown that this approach is susceptible to poisoning attacks from the side of remote clients. To address the poisoning attacks on FL, we provide a \textit{two-phase} defense algorithm called {Lo}cal {Ma}licious Facto{r} (LoMar). In phase I, LoMar scores model updates from each remote client by measuring the relative dist…
University of Louisville（路易斯维尔大学）；North Carolina State University（北卡罗来纳州立大学）；University of Wisconsin-Whitewater（威斯康星大学怀特沃特分校）；Wayne State University（韦恩州立大学）；The Ohio State University（俄亥俄州立大学）；IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center（IBM托马斯·J·沃森研究中心）；Duke University（杜克大学）
Machine learning models trained on data from the outside world can be corrupted by data poisoning attacks that inject malicious points into the models' training sets. A common defense against these attacks is data sanitization: first filter out anomalous training points before training the model. In this paper, we develop three attacks that can bypass a broad range of common data sanitization defenses, including anomaly detectors based on nearest neighbors, training loss, and singular-value decomposition. By adding just 3% poisoned data, our attacks successfully increase test error on the Enro…
Data poisoning is a type of adversarial attack on training data where an attacker manipulates a fraction of data to degrade the performance of machine learning model. Therefore, applications that rely on external data-sources for training data are at a significantly higher risk. There are several known defensive mechanisms that can help in mitigating the threat from such attacks. For example, data sanitization is a popular defensive mechanism wherein the learner rejects those data points that are sufficiently far from the set of training instances. Prior work on data poisoning defense primaril…
Data poisoning attacks aim to manipulate the model produced by a learning algorithm by adversarially modifying the training set. We consider differential privacy as a defensive measure against this type of attack. We show that such learners are resistant to data poisoning attacks when the adversary is only able to poison a small number of items. However, this protection degrades as the adversary poisons more data. To illustrate, we design attack algorithms targeting objective and output perturbation learners, two standard approaches to differentially-private machine learning. Experiments show …
Naive Bayes spam filters are highly susceptible to data poisoning attacks. Here, known spam sources/blacklisted IPs exploit the fact that their received emails will be treated as (ground truth) labeled spam examples, and used for classifier training (or re-training). The attacking source thus generates emails that will skew the spam model, potentially resulting in great degradation in classifier accuracy. Such attacks are successful mainly because of the poor representation power of the naive Bayes (NB) model, with only a single (component) density to represent spam (plus a possible attack). W…
Huazhong University of Science and Technology（华中科技大学）；Wuhan University of Technology（武汉理工大学）；Georgia Institute of Technology（佐治亚理工学院）
Machine learning techniques have been widely applied to various applications. However, they are potentially vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, where sophisticated attackers can disrupt the learning procedure by injecting a fraction of malicious samples into the training dataset. Existing defense techniques against poisoning attacks are largely attack-specific: they are designed for one specific type of attacks but do not work for other types, mainly due to the distinct principles they follow. Yet few general defense strategies have been developed. In this paper, we propose De-Pois, an attac…
FedMID: A Data-Free Method for Using Intermediate Outputs as a Defense Mechanism Against Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning
School of Computing, KAIST（韩国科学技术院计算机学院）；Samsung Research（三星研究院）；Data Science Group, Institute for Basic Science（基础科学研究院数据科学组）；Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy（马克斯·普朗克安全与隐私研究所）
Princeton University（普林斯顿大学）；University of Chicago（芝加哥大学）；IBM
Federated learning is inherently vulnerable to model poisoning attacks because its decentralized nature allows attackers to participate with compromised devices. In model poisoning attacks, the attacker reduces the model's performance on targeted sub-tasks (e.g. classifying planes as birds) by uploading "poisoned" updates. In this report we introduce \algoname{}, a novel defense that uses global top-k update sparsification and device-level gradient clipping to mitigate model poisoning attacks. We propose a theoretical framework for analyzing the robustness of defenses against poisoning attacks…
Adversarial data poisoning is an effective attack against machine learning and threatens model integrity by introducing poisoned data into the training dataset. So far, it has been studied mostly for classification, even though regression learning is used in many mission critical systems (such as dosage of medication, control of cyber-physical systems and managing power supply). Therefore, in the present research, we aim to evaluate all aspects of data poisoning attacks on regression learning, exceeding previous work both in terms of breadth and depth. We present realistic scenarios in which d…
University of Maryland, College Park（马里兰大学帕克分校）；University of Siegen（锡根大学）
Data poisoning and backdoor attacks manipulate victim models by maliciously modifying training data. In light of this growing threat, a recent survey of industry professionals revealed heightened fear in the private sector regarding data poisoning. Many previous defenses against poisoning either fail in the face of increasingly strong attacks, or they significantly degrade performance. However, we find that strong data augmentations, such as mixup and CutMix, can significantly diminish the threat of poisoning and backdoor attacks without trading off performance. We further verify the effective…
University of California Merced（加州大学默塞德分校）；Tagliatela College of Engineering（塔利亚泰拉工程学院）；University of New Haven（纽黑文大学）
State-of-the-art machine learning models are vulnerable to data poisoning attacks whose purpose is to undermine the integrity of the model. However, the current literature on data poisoning attacks is mainly focused on ad hoc techniques that are only applicable to specific machine learning models. Additionally, the existing data poisoning attacks in the literature are limited to either binary classifiers or to gradient-based algorithms. To address these limitations, this paper first proposes a novel model-free label-flipping attack based on the multi-modality of the data, in which the adversar…
Machine learning systems trained on user-provided data are susceptible to data poisoning attacks, whereby malicious users inject false training data with the aim of corrupting the learned model. While recent work has proposed a number of attacks and defenses, little is understood about the worst-case loss of a defense in the face of a determined attacker. We address this by constructing approximate upper bounds on the loss across a broad family of attacks, for defenders that first perform outlier removal followed by empirical risk minimization. Our approximation relies on two assumptions: (1) …
City University of Hong Kong（香港城市大学）；Monash University（莫纳什大学）；Tencent（腾讯）；Nanyang Technological University（南洋理工大学）
Semi-supervised Federated Learning (SSFL) has recently drawn much attention due to its practical consideration, i.e., the clients may only have unlabeled data. In practice, these SSFL systems implement semi-supervised training by assigning a "guessed" label to the unlabeled data near the labeled data to convert the unsupervised problem into a fully supervised problem. However, the inherent properties of such semi-supervised training techniques create a new attack surface. In this paper, we discover and reveal a simple yet powerful poisoning attack against SSFL. Our attack utilizes the natural …
Center for Machine Learning, University of Maryland - College Park（马里兰大学帕克分校机器学习中心）
Targeted clean-label data poisoning is a type of adversarial attack on machine learning systems in which an adversary injects a few correctly-labeled, minimally-perturbed samples into the training data, causing a model to misclassify a particular test sample during inference. Although defenses have been proposed for general poisoning attacks, no reliable defense for clean-label attacks has been demonstrated, despite the attacks' effectiveness and realistic applications. In this work, we propose a simple, yet highly-effective Deep k-NN defense against both feature collision and convex polytope …
Data Poisoning (DP) is an effective attack that causes trained classifiers to misclassify their inputs. DP attacks significantly degrade a classifier's accuracy by covertly injecting attack samples into the training set. Broadly applicable to different classifier structures, without strong assumptions about the attacker, an {\it unsupervised} Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)-based mixture model defense against "error generic" DP attacks is herein proposed that: 1) addresses the most challenging {\it embedded} DP scenario wherein, if DP is present, the poisoned samples are an {\it a priori}…
Iowa State University（爱荷华州立大学）；The Ohio State University（俄亥俄州立大学）；Duke University（杜克大学）
A key challenge of big data analytics is how to collect a large volume of (labeled) data. Crowdsourcing aims to address this challenge via aggregating and estimating high-quality data (e.g., sentiment label for text) from pervasive clients/users. Existing studies on crowdsourcing focus on designing new methods to improve the aggregated data quality from unreliable/noisy clients. However, the security aspects of such crowdsourcing systems remain under-explored to date. We aim to bridge this gap in this work. Specifically, we show that crowdsourcing is vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, in wh…
Machine learning models are vulnerable to data-poisoning attacks, in which an attacker maliciously modifies the training set to change the prediction of a learned model. In a trigger-less attack, the attacker can modify the training set but not the test inputs, while in a backdoor attack the attacker can also modify test inputs. Existing model-agnostic defense approaches either cannot handle backdoor attacks or do not provide effective certificates (i.e., a proof of a defense). We present BagFlip, a model-agnostic certified approach that can effectively defend against both trigger-less and bac…
Defending Against Sophisticated Poisoning Attacks with RL-based Aggregation in Federated Learning
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Blockchain and Privacy Computing（北京未来区块链与隐私计算高精尖创新中心）；Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Beihang University（北京航空航天大学人工智能研究院）
Data poisoning attacks and backdoor attacks aim to corrupt a machine learning classifier via modifying, adding, and/or removing some carefully selected training examples, such that the corrupted classifier makes incorrect predictions as the attacker desires. The key idea of state-of-the-art certified defenses against data poisoning attacks and backdoor attacks is to create a majority vote mechanism to predict the label of a testing example. Moreover, each voter is a base classifier trained on a subset of the training dataset. Classical simple learning algorithms such as k nearest neighbors (kN…
Do We Really Need to Design New Byzantine-robust Aggregation Rules?
Wichita State University（威奇托州立大学）；Rochester Institute of Technology（罗切斯特理工学院）；University of Louisville（路易斯维尔大学）；Florida International University（佛罗里达国际大学）；University of North Texas（北得克萨斯大学）
Sparsification Under Siege: Dual-Level Defense Against Poisoning in Communication-Efficient Federated Learning
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University（北京航空航天大学计算机科学与工程学院）；School of Cyber Science and Technology at Beihang University（北京航空航天大学网络安全科学与技术学院）；School of Cyberspace Science and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University（北京交通大学网络空间科学与技术学院）；Beijing Key Laboratory of Security and Privacy in Intelligent Transportation（北京智能交通安全与隐私重点实验室）；Zhongguancun Laboratory（中关村实验室）；School of Computing and Information,University of Pittsburgh（匹兹堡大学计算与信息学院）
Coordinated Sciences Laboratory（协同科学实验室）；University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign（伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校）
Federated learning systems that jointly preserve Byzantine robustness and privacy have remained an open problem. Robust aggregation, the standard defense for Byzantine attacks, generally requires server access to individual updates or nonlinear computation -- thus is incompatible with privacy-preserving methods such as secure aggregation via multiparty computation. To this end, we propose SHARE (Secure Hierarchical Robust Aggregation), a distributed learning framework designed to cryptographically preserve client update privacy and robustness to Byzantine adversaries simultaneously. The key id…
Ryerson University（瑞尔森大学）；Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México（墨西哥国立自治大学）
Federated Learning (FL) is a paradigm in Machine Learning (ML) that addresses data privacy, security, access rights and access to heterogeneous information issues by training a global model using distributed nodes. Despite its advantages, there is an increased potential for cyberattacks on FL-based ML techniques that can undermine the benefits. Model-poisoning attacks on FL target the availability of the model. The adversarial objective is to disrupt the training. We propose attestedFL, a defense mechanism that monitors the training of individual nodes through state persistence in order to det…
University of Maryland, College Park（马里兰大学帕克分校）；University of Wisconsin-Madison（威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校）；University of Toronto（多伦多大学）；Vector Institute（向量研究所）
Machine learning algorithms are vulnerable to data poisoning attacks. Prior taxonomies that focus on specific scenarios, e.g., indiscriminate or targeted, have enabled defenses for the corresponding subset of known attacks. Yet, this introduces an inevitable arms race between adversaries and defenders. In this work, we study the feasibility of an attack-agnostic defense relying on artifacts that are common to all poisoning attacks. Specifically, we focus on a common element between all attacks: they modify gradients computed to train the model. We identify two main artifacts of gradients compu…
Gradient Purification: Defense Against Poisoning Attack in Decentralized Federated Learning
Center for Data Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China（数据科学中心，浙江大学，杭州）；College of Computer Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China（计算机科学学院，浙江大学，杭州）
Healthcare IoMT systems are becoming intelligent, miniaturized, and more integrated into daily life. As for the distributed devices in the IoMT, federated learning has become a topical area with cloud-based training procedures when meeting data security. However, the distribution of IoMT has the risk of protection from data poisoning attacks. Poisoned data can be fabricated by falsifying medical data, which urges a security defense to IoMT systems. Due to the lack of specific labels, the filtering of malicious data is a unique unsupervised scenario. One of the main challenges is finding robust…
