Weak Human Preference Supervision For Deep Reinforcement Learning
University of Tasmania（塔斯马尼亚大学）；MyState Bank（MyState银行）；Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute（澳大利亚人工智能研究所）；University of Technology Sydney（悉尼科技大学）
Zehong Cao, KaiChiu Wong, Chin-Teng Lin
备注：
Submitting to IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
The current reward learning from human preferences could be used to resolve complex reinforcement learning (RL) tasks without access to a reward function by defining a single fixed preference between pairs of trajectory segments. However, the judgement of preferences between trajectories is not dynamic and still requires human input over thousands of iterations. In this study, we proposed a weak human preference supervision framework, for which we developed a human preference scaling model that naturally reflects the human perception of the degree of weak choices between trajectories and established a human-demonstration estimator via supervised learning to generate the predicted preferences for reducing the number of human inputs. The proposed weak human preference supervision framework can effectively solve complex RL tasks and achieve higher cumulative rewards in simulated robot locomotion -- MuJoCo games -- relative to the single fixed human preferences. Furthermore, our established human-demonstration estimator requires human feedback only for less than 0.01\% of the agent's interactions with the environment and significantly reduces the cost of human inputs by up to 30\% compared with the existing approaches. To present the flexibility of our approach, we released a video (https://youtu.be/jQPe1OILT0M) showing comparisons of the behaviours of agents trained on different types of human input. We believe that our naturally inspired human preferences with weakly supervised learning are beneficial for precise reward learning and can be applied to state-of-the-art RL systems, such as human-autonomy teaming systems.
Trinity College Dublin（都柏林圣三一学院）；IBM Ireland（IBM爱尔兰公司）
In complex tasks where the reward function is not straightforward and consists of a set of objectives, multiple reinforcement learning (RL) policies that perform task adequately, but employ different strategies can be trained by adjusting the impact of individual objectives on reward function. Understanding the differences in strategies between policies is necessary to enable users to choose between offered policies, and can help developers understand different behaviors that emerge from various reward functions and training hyperparameters in RL systems. In this work we compare behavior of tw…
C3: Rethinking Process Supervision via Confidence-Guided Credit Correction in Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications（北京邮电大学）；Peking University（北京大学）；Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院自动化研究所）；University of Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院大学）；University of International Business and Economics（对外经济贸易大学）
Arizona State University（亚利桑那州立大学）；Colorado State University（科罗拉多州立大学）
There is a growing interest in developing automated agents that can work alongside humans. In addition to completing the assigned task, such an agent will undoubtedly be expected to behave in a manner that is preferred by the human. This requires the human to communicate their preferences to the agent. To achieve this, the current approaches either require the users to specify the reward function or the preference is interactively learned from queries that ask the user to compare behavior. The former approach can be challenging if the internal representation used by the agent is inscrutable to…
We introduce a new algorithm for multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) with linear preferences, with the goal of enabling few-shot adaptation to new tasks. In MORL, the aim is to learn policies over multiple competing objectives whose relative importance (preferences) is unknown to the agent. While this alleviates dependence on scalar reward design, the expected return of a policy can change significantly with varying preferences, making it challenging to learn a single model to produce optimal policies under different preference conditions. We propose a generalized version of the Bell…
Reinforcement Learning has suffered from poor reward specification, and issues for reward hacking even in simple enough domains. Preference Based Reinforcement Learning attempts to solve the issue by utilizing binary feedbacks on queried trajectory pairs by a human in the loop indicating their preferences about the agent's behavior to learn a reward model. In this work, we present a state augmentation technique that allows the agent's reward model to be robust and follow an invariance consistency that significantly improved performance, i.e. the reward recovery and subsequent return computed u…
University of Bristol（布里斯托大学）；CortAIx, Thales（泰雷兹公司 CortAIx）
The potential of reinforcement learning (RL) to deliver aligned and performant agents is partially bottlenecked by the reward engineering problem. One alternative to heuristic trial-and-error is preference-based RL (PbRL), where a reward function is inferred from sparse human feedback. However, prior PbRL methods lack interpretability of the learned reward structure, which hampers the ability to assess robustness and alignment. We propose an online, active preference learning algorithm that constructs reward functions with the intrinsically interpretable, compositional structure of a tree. Usi…
Preference Elicitation for Offline Reinforcement Learning
ETH AI Center（ETH人工智能中心）；ETH Zürich（苏黎世联邦理工学院）；MPI for Intelligent Systems（智能系统马克斯·普朗克研究所）；ELLIS Institute Tübingen（图宾根ELLIS研究所）；University of Zürich（苏黎世大学）
Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-TUDA)（泛在知识处理实验室（UKP-TUDA））；Technische Universität Darmstadt（达姆施塔特工业大学）
We propose a method to perform automatic document summarisation without using reference summaries. Instead, our method interactively learns from users' preferences. The merit of preference-based interactive summarisation is that preferences are easier for users to provide than reference summaries. Existing preference-based interactive learning methods suffer from high sample complexity, i.e. they need to interact with the oracle for many rounds in order to converge. In this work, we propose a new objective function, which enables us to leverage active learning, preference learning and reinforc…
Microsoft Research（微软研究院）；MPI-SWS（马克斯·普朗克软件系统研究所）；ETH Zurich（苏黎世联邦理工学院）
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) enables an agent to learn complex behavior by observing demonstrations from a (near-)optimal policy. The typical assumption is that the learner's goal is to match the teacher's demonstrated behavior. In this paper, we consider the setting where the learner has its own preferences that it additionally takes into consideration. These preferences can for example capture behavioral biases, mismatched worldviews, or physical constraints. We study two teaching approaches: learner-agnostic teaching, where the teacher provides demonstrations from an optimal policy …
Reinforcement Learning with Pairwise Preferences in Long-Term Decision Problems
School of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada（麦吉尔大学计算机科学学院）；Mila - Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada（魁北克人工智能研究所）；Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA（斯坦福大学电气工程系）
Recent research on reinforcement learning in pure-conflict and pure-common interest games has emphasized the importance of population heterogeneity. In contrast, studies of reinforcement learning in mixed-motive games have primarily leveraged homogeneous approaches. Given the defining characteristic of mixed-motive games--the imperfect correlation of incentives between group members--we study the effect of population heterogeneity on mixed-motive reinforcement learning. We draw on interdependence theory from social psychology and imbue reinforcement learning agents with Social Value Orientatio…
Conveying complex objectives to reinforcement learning (RL) agents often requires meticulous reward engineering. Preference-based RL methods are able to learn a more flexible reward model based on human preferences by actively incorporating human feedback, i.e. teacher's preferences between two clips of behaviors. However, poor feedback-efficiency still remains a problem in current preference-based RL algorithms, as tailored human feedback is very expensive. To handle this issue, previous methods have mainly focused on improving query selection and policy initialization. At the same time, rece…
Microsoft（微软）；Carnegie Mellon University（卡内基梅隆大学）；University of California, Los Angles（加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校）
Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) replaces reward values in traditional reinforcement learning by preferences to better elicit human opinion on the target objective, especially when numerical reward values are hard to design or interpret. Despite promising results in applications, the theoretical understanding of PbRL is still in its infancy. In this paper, we present the first finite-time analysis for general PbRL problems. We first show that a unique optimal policy may not exist if preferences over trajectories are deterministic for PbRL. If preferences are stochastic, and the p…
Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) methods utilize binary feedback from the human in the loop (HiL) over queried trajectory pairs to learn a reward model in an attempt to approximate the human's underlying reward function capturing their preferences. In this work, we investigate the issue of a high degree of variability in the initialized reward models which are sensitive to random seeds of the experiment. This further compounds the issue of degenerate reward functions PbRL methods already suffer from. We propose a data-driven reward initialization method that does not add any addi…
KAIST（韩国科学技术院）；University of Michigan（密歇根大学）；LG AI Research（LG人工智能研究院）；UC Berkeley（加州大学伯克利分校）
Preference-based reinforcement learning (RL) has shown potential for teaching agents to perform the target tasks without a costly, pre-defined reward function by learning the reward with a supervisor's preference between the two agent behaviors. However, preference-based learning often requires a large amount of human feedback, making it difficult to apply this approach to various applications. This data-efficiency problem, on the other hand, has been typically addressed by using unlabeled samples or data augmentation techniques in the context of supervised learning. Motivated by the recent su…
SENIOR: Efficient Query Selection and Preference-Guided Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences（多模态人工智能系统国家重点实验室，自动化研究所）；School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院大学人工智能学院）
California Institute of Technology（加州理工学院）；Tsinghua University（清华大学）
In preference-based reinforcement learning (RL), an agent interacts with the environment while receiving preferences instead of absolute feedback. While there is increasing research activity in preference-based RL, the design of formal frameworks that admit tractable theoretical analysis remains an open challenge. Building upon ideas from preference-based bandit learning and posterior sampling in RL, we present DUELING POSTERIOR SAMPLING (DPS), which employs preference-based posterior sampling to learn both the system dynamics and the underlying utility function that governs the preference fee…
LEASE: Offline Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with High Sample Efficiency
State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences（多模态人工智能系统国家重点实验室，中国科学院自动化研究所）；School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院大学人工智能学院）；CASIA-MUST Joint Laboratory of Intelligence Science and Technology, Institute of Systems Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology（智能科学与技术CASIA-MUST联合实验室，澳门科学理工学院）
Preference-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms help avoid the pitfalls of hand-crafted reward functions by distilling them from human preference feedback, but they remain impractical due to the burdensome number of labels required from the human, even for relatively simple tasks. In this work, we demonstrate that encoding environment dynamics in the reward function (REED) dramatically reduces the number of preference labels required in state-of-the-art preference-based RL frameworks. We hypothesize that REED-based methods better partition the state-action space and facilitate generali…
RIME: Robust Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Noisy Preferences
State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems, CASIA（中国科学院自动化研究所多模态人工智能系统国家重点实验室）；School of Artificial Intelligence, the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院大学人工智能学院）
A shortcoming of batch reinforcement learning is its requirement for rewards in data, thus not applicable to tasks without reward functions. Existing settings for lack of reward, such as behavioral cloning, rely on optimal demonstrations collected from humans. Unfortunately, extensive expertise is required for ensuring optimality, which hinder the acquisition of large-scale data for complex tasks. This paper addresses the lack of reward in a batch reinforcement learning setting by learning a reward function from preferences. Generating preferences only requires a basic understanding of a task.…
Reinforcement learning (RL) requires access to a reward function that incentivizes the right behavior, but these are notoriously hard to specify for complex tasks. Preference-based RL provides an alternative: learning policies using a teacher's preferences without pre-defined rewards, thus overcoming concerns associated with reward engineering. However, it is difficult to quantify the progress in preference-based RL due to the lack of a commonly adopted benchmark. In this paper, we introduce B-Pref: a benchmark specially designed for preference-based RL. A key challenge with such a benchmark i…
Learning in Context, Guided by Choice: A Reward-Free Paradigm for Reinforcement Learning with Transformers
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, US（电子工程系，杜克大学，达勒姆，美国）；Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, US（计算机科学系，杜克大学，达勒姆，美国）；Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, US（生物统计学与生物信息学系，杜克大学，达勒姆，美国）；Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, US（统计学与数据科学系，耶鲁大学，纽 Haven，美国）
Preference Based Reinforcement Learning has shown much promise for utilizing human binary feedback on queried trajectory pairs to recover the underlying reward model of the Human in the Loop (HiL). While works have attempted to better utilize the queries made to the human, in this work we make two observations about the unlabeled trajectories collected by the agent and propose two corresponding loss functions that ensure participation of unlabeled trajectories in the reward learning process, and structure the embedding space of the reward model such that it reflects the structure of state spac…
