关于有效场论和自发对称性破缺的误解--对Ellis文章的回应
Misconceptions on Effective Field Theories and spontaneous symmetry breaking: Response to Ellis' article
摘要：
在较早的论文\cite{Luu:2019jmb}中，我们从有效场论的背景讨论了涌现，特别是与粒子和核物理学有关的涌现。我们站在还原论和弱涌现论的一边进行论证。George Ellis在~ \cite{Ellis:2020vij}中批评了我们的论述，在这里我们提供了对他的批评的回应。他的许多批评是基于不正确的假设有关的形式主义的有效场论，我们试图纠正这些问题在这里。我们还对他文件中的其他发言发表了评论。值得注意的是，我们的回应是对他在档案版本arXiv：2004.13591v1-5 [physics.hist-ph]中提出的批评的回应。也就是说，这个存档帖子的版本1-5。第6版与第1-5版的内容相似，但第7-9版似乎完全不同（即使标题不同）。
英文摘要：
In an earlier paper~\cite{Luu:2019jmb} we discussed emergence from the context of effective field theories, particularly as related to the fields of particle and nuclear physics. We argued on the side of reductionism and weak emergence. George Ellis has critiqued our exposition in~\cite{Ellis:2020vij}, and here we provide our response to his critiques. Many of his critiques are based on incorrect assumptions related to the formalism of effective field theories and we attempt to correct these issues here. We also comment on other statements made in his paper. Important to note is that our response is to his critiques made in archive versions arXiv:2004.13591v1-5 [physics.hist-ph]. That is, versions 1-5 of this archive post. Version 6 has similar content as versions 1-5, but versions 7-9 are seemingly a different paper altogether (even with a different title).
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
