arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
今晚才能更新了~~大家休息下再来吧
arXiv 2007.08034cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

聚类结果的评估与验证

Evaluating and Validating Cluster Results

Bowie State University(鲍伊州立大学)

Anupriya Vysala, Joseph Gomes

AI总结:

本文以IRIS数据集为例,结合外部评估指标(同质性、正确性、V-measure)和内部评估指标(轮廓系数、误差平方和)及树状图验证聚类簇数,并用频率分布方法对聚类结果与原始数据进行统计比较和可视化。

摘要:

聚类是根据数据特征对数据进行划分的技术。性质相似的数据属于同一个簇[1]。评估聚类质量有两类评价方法:一类是外部评估,即数据集中真实标签事先已知;另一类是内部评估,即在没有真实标签的情况下仅利用数据集本身进行评价。本文对IRIS数据集的聚类结果同时进行了外部评估和内部评估。在外部评估中,计算了该数据集的同质性(Homogeneity)、正确性(Correctness)和V-measure分数。在内部性能度量方面,使用了轮廓系数(Silhouette Index)和误差平方和(Sum of Square Errors)。这些内部性能度量与树状图(层次聚类中的图形工具)一起,首先用于验证聚类的簇数。最后,作为一种统计工具,我们使用频率分布方法来比较聚类结果与原始数据中观测值的分布,并提供可视化表示。

英文摘要:

Clustering is the technique to partition data according to their characteristics. Data that are similar in nature belong to the same cluster [1]. There are two types of evaluation methods to evaluate clustering quality. One is an external evaluation where the truth labels in the data sets are known in advance and the other is internal evaluation in which the evaluation is done with data set itself without true labels. In this paper, both external evaluation and internal evaluation are performed on the cluster results of the IRIS dataset. In the case of external evaluation Homogeneity, Correctness and V-measure scores are calculated for the dataset. For internal performance measures, the Silhouette Index and Sum of Square Errors are used. These internal performance measures along with the dendrogram (graphical tool from hierarchical Clustering) are used first to validate the number of clusters. Finally, as a statistical tool, we used the frequency distribution method to compare and provide a visual representation of the distribution of observations within a clustering result and the original data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑