在线发布法庭记录：规避隐私-透明度权衡
Online publication of court records: circumventing the privacy-transparency trade-off
摘要：
开放数据运动正在导致在线大规模发布法院记录，提高司法的透明度和可及性，并在现有丰富法律数据的基础上设计法律技术。然而，法律决策的敏感性也引发了重要的隐私问题。当前的实践通过将访问控制与（手动或半手动）文本编辑相结合来解决由此产生的隐私与透明度的权衡。在这项工作中，我们声称，目前的做法是不足以应付大规模访问的法律数据（限制性的访问控制政策是有害的开放性和实用性，而文本编辑是无法提供健全的隐私保护），并倡导一个整合的方法，可以受益于隐私保护的数据发布域的最新发展。我们提出了一个彻底的分析问题和当前的方法，并提出了一个稻草人多式联运架构铺平道路，一个成熟的隐私保护法律数据发布系统。
英文摘要：
The open data movement is leading to the massive publishing of court records online, increasing transparency and accessibility of justice, and to the design of legal technologies building on the wealth of legal data available. However, the sensitive nature of legal decisions also raises important privacy issues. Current practices solve the resulting privacy versus transparency trade-off by combining access control with (manual or semi-manual) text redaction. In this work, we claim that current practices are insufficient for coping with massive access to legal data (restrictive access control policies is detrimental to openness and to utility while text redaction is unable to provide sound privacy protection) and advocate for a in-tegrative approach that could benefit from the latest developments of the privacy-preserving data publishing domain. We present a thorough analysis of the problem and of the current approaches, and propose a straw man multimodal architecture paving the way to a full-fledged privacy-preserving legal data publishing system.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
