arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2006.15693eess.IVcs.CV
收藏

Simulation of Brain Resection for Cavity Segmentation Using Self-Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learning

Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London(伦敦大学学院威尔康姆EPSRC介入与外科科学中心(WEISS));School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS), King’s College London(伦敦国王学院生物医学工程与成像科学学院(BMEIS));Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London(伦敦大学学院女王广场神经病学研究所临床与实验癫痫系);National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London(伦敦女王广场神经与神经外科医院)

Fernando Pérez-García, Roman Rodionov, Ali Alim-Marvasti, Rachel Sparks, John S. Duncan, Sébastien Ourselin

英文摘要:

Resective surgery may be curative for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but only 40% to 70% of patients achieve seizure freedom after surgery. Retrospective quantitative analysis could elucidate patterns in resected structures and patient outcomes to improve resective surgery. However, the resection cavity must first be segmented on the postoperative MR image. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are the state-of-the-art image segmentation technique, but require large amounts of annotated data for training. Annotation of medical images is a time-consuming process requiring highly-trained raters, and often suffering from high inter-rater variability. Self-supervised learning can be used to generate training instances from unlabeled data. We developed an algorithm to simulate resections on preoperative MR images. We curated a new dataset, EPISURG, comprising 431 postoperative and 269 preoperative MR images from 431 patients who underwent resective surgery. In addition to EPISURG, we used three public datasets comprising 1813 preoperative MR images for training. We trained a 3D CNN on artificially resected images created on the fly during training, using images from 1) EPISURG, 2) public datasets and 3) both. To evaluate trained models, we calculate Dice score (DSC) between model segmentations and 200 manual annotations performed by three human raters. The model trained on data with manual annotations obtained a median (interquartile range) DSC of 65.3 (30.6). The DSC of our best-performing model, trained with no manual annotations, is 81.7 (14.2). For comparison, inter-rater agreement between human annotators was 84.0 (9.9). We demonstrate a training method for CNNs using simulated resection cavities that can accurately segment real resection cavities, without manual annotations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑