一个统一的纳米出版模型，用于有效和User-Friendly访问科学出版的元素
A Unified Nanopublication Model for Effective and User-Friendly Access to the Elements of Scientific Publishing
摘要：
科学出版是我们交流和分享科学知识的手段，但这一过程目前往往缺乏透明度和机器可解释的表示。科学文章是以具有复杂结构的长粗粒度文本发布的，并且它们是针对人类读者而不是自动组织和访问方式进行优化的。同行评审是质量评估的主要方法，但这些同行评审现在很少发表，其复杂的结构和与相关文章的链接也无法访问。为了解决这些问题，并更好地使科学出版与网络和关联数据的原则保持一致，我们在这里提出了一种方法，使用纳米出版作为一个统一的模型，以语义的方式表示出版物的元素，它们的评估，以及所涉及的过程，演员和一般的出处。为了评估我们的方法，我们提出了一个627个nanopublications的数据集，代表了文章元素（如个别段落）及其评论（如个别评论）的互联网络。专注于编辑执行元审查的特定场景，我们介绍了七个能力问题，并展示了如何将它们作为SPARQL查询执行。然后，我们提出了一个原型的用户界面的情况下，显示不同的意见，提供了一个给定的手稿的审查意见集，我们在用户研究中显示，编辑发现界面有用的回答他们的能力问题。总之，我们证明了基于纳米出版的统一语义出版模型可以使科学交流更加有效和用户友好。
英文摘要：
Scientific publishing is the means by which we communicate and share scientific knowledge, but this process currently often lacks transparency and machine-interpretable representations. Scientific articles are published in long coarse-grained text with complicated structures, and they are optimized for human readers and not for automated means of organization and access. Peer reviewing is the main method of quality assessment, but these peer reviews are nowadays rarely published and their own complicated structure and linking to the respective articles is not accessible. In order to address these problems and to better align scientific publishing with the principles of the Web and Linked Data, we propose here an approach to use nanopublications as a unifying model to represent in a semantic way the elements of publications, their assessments, as well as the involved processes, actors, and provenance in general. To evaluate our approach, we present a dataset of 627 nanopublications representing an interlinked network of the elements of articles (such as individual paragraphs) and their reviews (such as individual review comments). Focusing on the specific scenario of editors performing a meta-review, we introduce seven competency questions and show how they can be executed as SPARQL queries. We then present a prototype of a user interface for that scenario that shows different views on the set of review comments provided for a given manuscript, and we show in a user study that editors find the interface useful to answer their competency questions. In summary, we demonstrate that a unified and semantic publication model based on nanopublications can make scientific communication more effective and user-friendly.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
