arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2006.04666cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

误传具有高度迷惑性

Misinformation Has High Perplexity

Center for Artificial Intelligence Research (CAiRE)(人工智能研究中心(CAiRE));Hong Kong University of Science and Technology(香港科技大学)

Nayeon Lee, Yejin Bang, Andrea Madotto, Pascale Fung

摘要:

揭穿错误信息是一项重要和时间紧迫的任务,因为如果错误信息不及时消除,可能会产生不利后果。然而,通常通过错误信息分类进行揭穿的监督方法需要人工注释的数据,并且不适合新出现的事件(如COVID-19爆发)的快速时间框架。在本文中,我们假设错误信息本身具有更高的困惑相比,真实的陈述,并建议利用困惑揭穿虚假索赔在无监督的方式。首先,我们从科学和新闻来源中提取可靠的证据,根据句子的相似性索赔。其次,我们用提取的证据来填充一个语言模型,最后根据揭穿时的困惑分数来评估给定声明的正确性。我们构建了两个新的COVID-19相关测试集,一个是科学的,另一个是政治的内容,并实证验证了我们的系统与现有系统相比表现良好。我们公开发布这些数据集,以鼓励更多的研究来揭穿有关COVID-19和其他主题的错误信息。

英文摘要:

Debunking misinformation is an important and time-critical task as there could be adverse consequences when misinformation is not quashed promptly. However, the usual supervised approach to debunking via misinformation classification requires human-annotated data and is not suited to the fast time-frame of newly emerging events such as the COVID-19 outbreak. In this paper, we postulate that misinformation itself has higher perplexity compared to truthful statements, and propose to leverage the perplexity to debunk false claims in an unsupervised manner. First, we extract reliable evidence from scientific and news sources according to sentence similarity to the claims. Second, we prime a language model with the extracted evidence and finally evaluate the correctness of given claims based on the perplexity scores at debunking time. We construct two new COVID-19-related test sets, one is scientific, and another is political in content, and empirically verify that our system performs favorably compared to existing systems. We are releasing these datasets publicly to encourage more research in debunking misinformation on COVID-19 and other topics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑