arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2006.03671astro-ph.IMastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
收藏

表征ALMA线偏振镶嵌的精度

Characterizing the accuracy of ALMA linear-polarization mosaics

Charles L. H. Hull, Paulo C. Cortes, Valentin J. M. Le Gouellec, Josep M. Girart, Hiroshi Nagai, Kouichiro Nakanishi, Seiji Kameno, Edward B. Fomalont, Crystal … 展开作者

Charles L. H. Hull, Paulo C. Cortes, Valentin J. M. Le Gouellec, Josep M. Girart, Hiroshi Nagai, Kouichiro Nakanishi, Seiji Kameno, Edward B. Fomalont, Crystal L. Brogan, George A. Moellenbrock, Rosita Paladino, Eric Villard

摘要:

我们使用阿塔卡玛大型毫米/亚毫米阵列(ALMA)的线性偏振马赛克的准确性。首先,我们在波段3、5、6和7(分别为3 mm、1.6 mm、1.3 mm和0.87 mm)观测到明亮的高度线偏振的blazar 3C 279。在每个波段,我们测量了blazar的偏振11 $\times$ 11网格均匀间隔偏移点覆盖的半峰全宽(FWHM)地区的主要光束。在将从3C 279的轴上指向导出的校准解决方案应用于所有轴上和离轴数据之后,我们发现在所有频率下穿过初级光束的剩余偏振误差是相似的:线偏振分数$P_\textrm{frac}$和偏振位置角$χ$的残差为$\lesssim$ 0.001($\lesssim$为斯托克斯$I$的0.1%)和$\lesssim$ 1 $^\circ$;误差增大到$\sim$ 0.003 ~ 0.005由于(线性偏振)$Q$和$U$图中的不对称光束图案,在FWHM附近的$\sim$ 1-5($\sim$ 0.3-0.5%的斯托克斯$I$)和$\sim$ 1-5 $^\circ$。我们在圆偏振(Stokes $V$)图中看到了预期的双叶“光束斜视”图案。其次,为了测试偏振精度在一个典型的ALMA项目,我们进行了观测的连续线性偏振朝向Kleinmann-Low星云在猎户座(猎户座-KL)使用几个马赛克图案在波段3和6。我们发现,镶嵌后,残余的离轴误差减少重叠的多个点的结果。最后,我们将ALMA马赛克与Orion-KL的档案1.3 mm CARMA偏振马赛克进行比较,发现偏振模式具有良好的一致性。

英文摘要:

We characterize the accuracy of linear-polarization mosaics made using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). First, we observed the bright, highly linearly polarized blazar 3C 279 at Bands 3, 5, 6, and 7 (3 mm, 1.6 mm, 1.3 mm, and 0.87 mm, respectively). At each band, we measured the blazar's polarization on an 11$\times$11 grid of evenly-spaced offset pointings covering the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) area of the primary beam. After applying calibration solutions derived from the on-axis pointing of 3C 279 to all of the on- and off-axis data, we find that the residual polarization errors across the primary beam are similar at all frequencies: the residual errors in linear polarization fraction $P_\textrm{frac}$ and polarization position angle $χ$ are $\lesssim$0.001 ($\lesssim$0.1% of Stokes $I$) and $\lesssim$1$^\circ$ near the center of the primary beam; the errors increase to $\sim$0.003-0.005 ($\sim$0.3-0.5% of Stokes $I$) and $\sim$1-5$^\circ$ near the FWHM as a result of the asymmetric beam patterns in the (linearly polarized) $Q$ and $U$ maps. We see the expected double-lobed "beam squint" pattern in the circular polarization (Stokes $V$) maps. Second, to test the polarization accuracy in a typical ALMA project, we performed observations of continuum linear polarization toward the Kleinmann-Low nebula in Orion (Orion-KL) using several mosaic patterns at Bands 3 and 6. We show that after mosaicking, the residual off-axis errors decrease as a result of overlapping multiple pointings. Finally, we compare the ALMA mosaics with an archival 1.3 mm CARMA polarization mosaic of Orion-KL and find good consistency in the polarization patterns.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑