arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新，休息一下吧，周末愉快~~
arXiv 2006.01599math.GM
收藏

费马有解吗？他的大定理的初等证明

Did have Fermat the solution? An elementary proof of his Last Theorem

Miguel Antonio Marano Calzolari

备注：
10 pages, in Spanish. The paper contains some wrong identities. This invalidates its conclusion. More precisely, in page 3, after equation (6), it is affirmed that bk-3=j_{1d} and ak-2=x. What it actually holds is that bk-3 is a multiple of j_[1d} and ak-2 a multiple of x. This kind of incorrect arguments is repeated afterwards, in page 7 and at the beginning of page 8, and finally in page 10, after equation (20). In this way the statement is not correctly proved, and I apologise for this situation. So I request the article be removed from the arXiv, or if this is not possible, at least that the present comment of the author be displayed to the potential readers. Finally I say that I have tried to, but unfortunately I cannot fix the errors. Thank you
阅读 PDF
arXiv 页面 ↗HTML 原文 ↗

摘要：

给出了费马大定理的一个初等证明。没有使用辅助结果，甚至没有使用最基本的结果。证明直接导致费马方程在整数集合中的矛盾。

英文摘要：

We present an elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. No ancillary results are used, not even the most basic ones. The proof directly leads to a contradiction of the Fermat equation in the set of integers.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。

↑