arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.13756cs.CL
收藏

SIGMORPHON 2020无监督形态学范式完成共享任务

The SIGMORPHON 2020 Shared Task on Unsupervised Morphological Paradigm Completion

University of Colorado Boulder(科罗拉多大学博尔德分校);Johns Hopkins University(约翰斯·霍普金斯大学);University of British Columbia(不列颠哥伦比亚大学)

Katharina Kann, Arya McCarthy, Garrett Nicolai, Mans Hulden

摘要:

在本文中,我们描述了SIGMORPHON 2020共享任务在无监督形态范式完成(SIGMORPHON 2020任务2),在屈折形态学领域的一个新的任务的结果。参与者被要求提交系统,该系统将原始文本和词元列表作为输入,并输出所有的屈折形式,即,每个词元的整个形态学范式。为了模拟真实的用例,我们首先发布了5种开发语言的数据。然而,系统在9种令人惊讶的语言上进行了正式评估,这些语言在提交截止日期前几天才公布。我们提供了一个模块化的基线系统,它是一个由4个组件组成的管道。3个团队总共提交了7个系统,但令人惊讶的是,没有一个提交的系统能够在所有9种测试语言的平均基线上有所改进。只有3种语言的提交系统获得了最佳结果。这表明,无监督的形态学范式完成在很大程度上仍然没有解决。我们在这里提出了一个分析,以便这个共同的任务将进一步研究的主题。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we describe the findings of the SIGMORPHON 2020 shared task on unsupervised morphological paradigm completion (SIGMORPHON 2020 Task 2), a novel task in the field of inflectional morphology. Participants were asked to submit systems which take raw text and a list of lemmas as input, and output all inflected forms, i.e., the entire morphological paradigm, of each lemma. In order to simulate a realistic use case, we first released data for 5 development languages. However, systems were officially evaluated on 9 surprise languages, which were only revealed a few days before the submission deadline. We provided a modular baseline system, which is a pipeline of 4 components. 3 teams submitted a total of 7 systems, but, surprisingly, none of the submitted systems was able to improve over the baseline on average over all 9 test languages. Only on 3 languages did a submitted system obtain the best results. This shows that unsupervised morphological paradigm completion is still largely unsolved. We present an analysis here, so that this shared task will ground further research on the topic.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑