Planning and reinforcement learning are two key approaches to sequential decision making. Multi-step approximate real-time dynamic programming, a recently successful algorithm class of which AlphaZero [Silver et al., 2018] is an example, combines both by nesting planning within a learning loop. However, the combination of planning and learning introduces a new question: how should we balance time spend on planning, learning and acting? The importance of this trade-off has not been explicitly studied before. We show that it is actually of key importance, with computational results indicating that we should neither plan too long nor too short. Conceptually, we identify a new spectrum of planning-learning algorithms which ranges from exhaustive search (long planning) to model-free RL (no planning), with optimal performance achieved midway.
MedScope: Incentivizing "Think with Videos" for Clinical Reasoning via Coarse-to-Fine Tool Calling
College of Health Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China(上海交通大学医学院健康科学与技术学院);Fudan University, Shanghai, China(复旦大学);Shanghai Innovation Institute, Shanghai, China(上海创新研究院);Tsinghua University, Beijing, China(清华大学);Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China(上海人工智能实验室);The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China(香港中文大学);Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China(上海交通大学瑞金医院)
Adaptive Look, Flexible Thought: Learning How and How Long to Think in Multimodal Reasoning
Sun Yat-sen University(中山大学);Shenzhen Loop Area Institute(深圳河套学院);Beijing Zhongguancun Academy(北京中关村研究院);Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd(华为技术有限公司);Harbin Institute of Technology(哈尔滨工业大学)