arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.04307astro-ph.GA
收藏

球状恒星形成云中的磁场结构。II。从观测图估计场结构

Magnetic Field Structure in Spheroidal Star-Forming Clouds. II. Estimating Field Structure from Observed Maps

Philip C. Myers, Ian W. Stephens, Sayantan Auddy, Shantanu Basu, Tyler L. Bourke, Charles L. H. Hull

摘要:

本文提出了模型,估计结构的密度和磁场强度的球状凝聚,从他们的柱密度和他们的磁排列尘埃颗粒的极化图。密度模型是通过拟合柱密度图与嵌入的p = 2普卢默球体的任何纵横比和倾角。磁性是基于密度模型,基于Davis-Prasekhar-Fermi(DCF)的Alfvénic涨落模型,以及基于论文I中的质量和通量守恒的球体通量冻结(SFF)模型。场强模型具有柱密度图的分辨率,其比场强的DCF估计的分辨率更精细。该模型适用于ALMA观测的包络的原恒星BHR 71 IRS 1。柱密度拟合给出了密度模型,从(2.0 +- 0.4)x 10^5 cm^-3到(7 +- 1)x 10^7 cm^-3。密度模型预测的场方向图在1100 au内与极化图拟合最好,角差标准差为17°。在该区域,DCF平均场强为0.7 +- 0.2 mG,包层质量为超临界,质量与磁临界质量之比为1.5 +- 0.4。SFF场强分布与DCF场强成比例,从60 x 10μG到4+-1 mG。SFF场强估计的空间分辨率比DCF分辨率精细约7倍,并且峰值SFF场强超过DCF场强约5倍。

英文摘要:

This paper presents models to estimate the structure of density and magnetic field strength in spheroidal condensations, from maps of their column density and their polarization of magnetically aligned dust grains. The density model is obtained by fitting a column density map with an embedded p = 2 Plummer spheroid of any aspect ratio and inclination. The magnetic properties are based on the density model, on the Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi (DCF) model of Alfvénic fluctuations, and on the Spheroid Flux Freezing (SFF) model of mass and flux conservation in Paper I. The field strength model has the resolution of the column density map, which is finer than the resolution of the DCF estimate of field strength. The models are applied to ALMA observations of the envelope of the protostar BHR71 IRS1. Column density fits give the density model, from (2.0 +- 0.4) x 10^5 cm^-3 to (7 +- 1) x 10^7 cm^-3 . The density model predicts the field directions map, which fits the polarization map best within 1100 au, with standard deviation of angle differences 17°. In this region the DCF mean field strength is 0.7 +- 0.2 mG and the envelope mass is supercritical, with ratio of mass to magnetic critical mass 1.5 +- 0.4. The SFF field strength profile scales with the DCF field strength, from 60 x 10μG to 4+-1 mG. The spatial resolution of the SFF field strength estimate is finer than the DCF resolution by a factor ~7, and the peak SFF field strength exceeds the DCF field strength by a factor ~5.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑