arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.03754cs.CL

FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization

Cornell University(康奈尔大学);New York University(纽约大学);The George Washington University(乔治华盛顿大学);Amazon Web Services AI(亚马逊网络服务人工智能)

Esin Durmus, He He, Mona Diab

英文摘要:

Neural abstractive summarization models are prone to generate content inconsistent with the source document, i.e. unfaithful. Existing automatic metrics do not capture such mistakes effectively. We tackle the problem of evaluating faithfulness of a generated summary given its source document. We first collected human annotations of faithfulness for outputs from numerous models on two datasets. We find that current models exhibit a trade-off between abstractiveness and faithfulness: outputs with less word overlap with the source document are more likely to be unfaithful. Next, we propose an automatic question answering (QA) based metric for faithfulness, FEQA, which leverages recent advances in reading comprehension. Given question-answer pairs generated from the summary, a QA model extracts answers from the document; non-matched answers indicate unfaithful information in the summary. Among metrics based on word overlap, embedding similarity, and learned language understanding models, our QA-based metric has significantly higher correlation with human faithfulness scores, especially on highly abstractive summaries.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑