arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.02160cs.CVcs.LGeess.IVstat.ML

用于图像反取证的打印与扫描攻击

Printing and Scanning Attack for Image Counter Forensics

Lendbuzz(Lendbuzz公司)

Hailey Joren, Otkrist Gupta, Dan Raviv

AI总结:

本文探索了打印与扫描这一新型图像反取证攻击方法,揭示了现有先进篡改检测模型的脆弱性,并提出一种在此类攻击下表现更优的新模型,同时构建了相关数据集。

摘要:

随着图像篡改工具变得越来越普及和先进,检验图像的真实性变得越来越重要。近期的研究表明,尽管基于 CNN 的图像篡改检测器能够成功识别篡改,但它们也容易受到对抗性攻击,从简单的双重 JPEG 压缩到高级的基于像素的扰动。在本文中,我们探索了另一种极具可行性的攻击方法:打印与扫描。我们展示了两个最先进的模型对这种攻击的脆弱性。我们还提出了一种新的机器学习模型,当在打印和扫描图像上进行训练和验证时,其性能与这些最先进的模型相当。在这三个模型中,当在来自单台打印机的图像上进行训练和验证时,我们提出的模型优于其他模型。为了促进这项探索,我们创建了一个包含超过 6,000 个打印和扫描图像块的数据集。进一步的分析表明,不同打印机生成的图像之间的差异是显著的,大到足以说明:在一台打印机的图像上取得良好的验证准确率,并不意味着在来自另一台打印机的相同图像上也能获得相似的验证准确率。

英文摘要:

Examining the authenticity of images has become increasingly important as manipulation tools become more accessible and advanced. Recent work has shown that while CNN-based image manipulation detectors can successfully identify manipulations, they are also vulnerable to adversarial attacks, ranging from simple double JPEG compression to advanced pixel-based perturbation. In this paper we explore another method of highly plausible attack: printing and scanning. We demonstrate the vulnerability of two state-of-the-art models to this type of attack. We also propose a new machine learning model that performs comparably to these state-of-the-art models when trained and validated on printed and scanned images. Of the three models, our proposed model outperforms the others when trained and validated on images from a single printer. To facilitate this exploration, we create a dataset of over 6,000 printed and scanned image blocks. Further analysis suggests that variation between images produced from different printers is significant, large enough that good validation accuracy on images from one printer does not imply similar validation accuracy on identical images from a different printer.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑