arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.00719cs.CL
收藏

Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);Technion -- Israel Institute of Technology(以色列理工学院)

Abhilasha Ravichander, Yonatan Belinkov, Eduard Hovy

英文摘要:

Although neural models have achieved impressive results on several NLP benchmarks, little is understood about the mechanisms they use to perform language tasks. Thus, much recent attention has been devoted to analyzing the sentence representations learned by neural encoders, through the lens of `probing' tasks. However, to what extent was the information encoded in sentence representations, as discovered through a probe, actually used by the model to perform its task? In this work, we examine this probing paradigm through a case study in Natural Language Inference, showing that models can learn to encode linguistic properties even if they are not needed for the task on which the model was trained. We further identify that pretrained word embeddings play a considerable role in encoding these properties rather than the training task itself, highlighting the importance of careful controls when designing probing experiments. Finally, through a set of controlled synthetic tasks, we demonstrate models can encode these properties considerably above chance-level even when distributed in the data as random noise, calling into question the interpretation of absolute claims on probing tasks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑